Parasellar T2 Dark Sign on MR Imaging in Patients with Lymphocytic Hypophysitis

Y. Nakata; N. Sato; T. Masumoto; H. Mori; H. Akai; H. Nobusawa; Y. Adachi; H. Oba; K. Ohtomo

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2201

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging findings of LYH and pituitary adenomas are similar, but the therapeutic strategies are completely different. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sellar and parasellar MR imaging findings in patients with both diseases, as well as characteristic clinical findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical findings, including endocrinologic study and MR images of 20 patients with LYH and 22 patients with pituitary adenoma, were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the MR images in relation to the following: 1) the PPHI on T1-weighted images, 2) thickened stalk (>3.5 mm), 3) pituitary symmetry, 4) pituitary enhancement pattern, 5) a dural tail, and 6) parasellar signal intensity on T2- and T1-weighted images.

RESULTS: Between patients with LYH and those with pituitary adenoma, a significant difference was identified for the number of patients with loss of PPHI, thickened stalk, pituitary symmetry, homogeneous enhancement, and parasellar dark signal intensity on T2-weighted images by statistical analysis (Fisher exact probability test, P < .05). Among them, only parasellar dark signal intensity on T2-weighted images had no false-positive cases.

CONCLUSIONS: The parasellar T2 dark sign can be a specific finding used to distinguish pituitary adenoma from LYH.

Abbreviations

ACTH: adrenocorticotrophic hormone
AL: anterior lobe
DI: diabetes insipidus
Dp: desmopressin
FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone
Gc: glucocorticoid
GH: growth hormone
GHs: GH-secreting
ICA: internal carotid artery
IgG4: immunoglobulin 4
Iso: isointense
L: left
LH: luteinizing hormone
Lt: levothyroxine
LYH: lymphocytic hypophysitis
MRI: MR imaging
Non-f: nonfunctioning
PA: pituitary adenoma
Pan-hypo: panhypopituitarism
Partial-hyper: partial hyperpituitarism
Partial-hypo: partial hypopituitarism
PL: posterior lobe
PPHI: posterior pituitary T1 high intensity
PRL: prolactin
PRLs: PRL-secreting
R: right
synd: syndrome
T1WI: T1-weighted imaging
T2WI: T2-weighted imaging
Ts: testosterone
TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone

LYH is a rare inflammatory disease of the pituitary gland. This condition is characterized by lymphocytic infiltration and eventual destruction of the pituitary tissue accompanied by various degrees of pituitary dysfunction. This disease is now known to affect both pituitary lobes, at all ages and in both sexes.^1–6 An autoimmune pathogenesis is suggested by several histopathologic, laboratory, and clinical findings.⁷

LYH is often misdiagnosed because its clinical and radiologic features mimic tumors in the sellar and parasellar region.¹ The main diagnostic issue is that LYH is a relatively rare disease, and its imaging findings are not well-recognized in contrast to those of overwhelmingly more common pituitary tumors, pituitary adenomas.⁸ Distinguishing LYH from pituitary adenomas is very important because different therapeutic strategies are used to treat the 2 diseases. The treatment of LYH remains controversial, though conservative management with close clinical observation has been advocated on the basis of its often benign transient course.^9,10 The correct diagnosis of LYH contributes to avoiding needless surgery, which is invasive and sometimes results in endocrine dysfunction. However, distinguishing LYH from pituitary adenomas can be difficult. Leung et al⁹ reported that even with MR imaging studies, approximately 40% of the cases are misdiagnosed preoperatively as pituitary adenomas. MR imaging findings in patients with LYH and pituitary adenoma were reported in some recent articles.^{2,3,8,11–14} However, most previous reports of MR imaging findings of LYH were case reports and/or reviews of the literature.

Recently, we experienced some cases of LYH, which showed dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images around the pituitary gland and in the cavernous sinus. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported such signal-intensity abnormalities. We hypothesized that dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images around the pituitary gland and in the cavernous sinus were characteristic in patients with LYH and were useful for distinguishing pituitary adenoma from LYH.

The present study was retrospectively performed to review a series of clinical and MR imaging findings in patients with LYH, including signal intensity around the pituitary gland. As a control study, we also evaluated clinical and MR imaging findings in patients with pituitary adenoma for comparison.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed the MR imaging findings in 20 patients with LYH who were selected by review of clinical records. Our local ethics committee did not require its approval or informed consent for this retrospective review. A retrospective review of clinical records in 6 hospitals from 1987 to 2009 revealed 24 patients who were clinically diagnosed as LYH. Two patients who had a history of sarcoidosis or pachymeningitis, and 2 patients whose initial MR images had not been available were excluded from the study. As a consequence, 20 patients with LYH were enrolled. Ten were males and 10 were females, from 9 to 72 years of age, with a mean age of 46.0 ± 19.5 years (On-line Table 1). Four of 20 patients had histologically proved disease by transsphenoidal biopsy. The remaining 16 patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical and endocrinologic studies, MR imaging findings, response to steroid therapy, and natural clinical course.^4,7 Five patients had a history of autoimmune diseases, such as IgG4-related disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, and bullous pemphigoid. One patient was pregnant.

We also reviewed the clinical and MR imaging findings in 22 patients with pituitary adenoma. A retrospective review of clinical records in 1 hospital from 2002 to 2009 revealed 52 patients who were treated with transsphenoidal resection and had a proved pathologic diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. Sixteen patients who had recurrent pituitary adenomas and underwent a second operation, 11 patients whose pathologies did not differentiate between functioning and nonfunctioning adenoma because immunostaining was not performed, 2 patients whose initial MR images had not been available, and 1 patient who received irradiation due to malignancy were excluded from the study. As a consequence, 22 patients with pituitary adenoma were enrolled. Ten were men and 12 were women, and they ranged in age from 25 to 73 years, with a mean age of 50.3 ± 15.8 years (On-line Table 2). All patients were treated with transsphenoidal resection, and their pathologies were proved.

In all patients with LYH and pituitary adenoma, the plasma concentrations of ACTH, GH, PRL, LH, FSH, TSH, cortisol, free T4, and testosterone were measured. Provocative tests were performed as follows: for TSH and PRL, after a bolus injection of 500 mg of TSH-releasing hormone; for LH and FSH, 100 mg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone; for GH, 100 mg of GH-releasing hormone or 0.1 U of regular insulin per kilogram of body weight; and for cortisol, 0.25 mg of ACTH or 0.1 U of regular insulin per kilogram of body weight. Multiple blood samples were collected to measure plasma hormone concentrations before and for up to 120 minutes after the injections. In patients with LYH except for cases 2, 8, and 13, plasma vasopressin concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay, and plasma and urinary osmolarities were measured before and after 4–8 hours of water deprivation. In cases 9, 11, 21, and 22 of patients with pituitary adenoma, hormonal examination was done for the posterior lobe by using the same method.

MR Imaging Acquisition

All patients with LYH and pituitary adenoma underwent MR imaging of the sella turcica with 1.5T superconductive units. Patients with LYH underwent MR imaging with 6 units in 6 hospitals, and patients with pituitary adenoma underwent 1 MR imaging in 1 hospital. T1-weighted images were acquired in the coronal and sagittal planes with the following parameters: TR/TE/NEX = 300–660/7.9–23 ms/3–4, a 192 × 256 to 512 × 512 matrix, a 14- to 20-cm FOV, a 3-mm section thickness, and a 0.0- to 0.6-mm intersection gap. T2-weighted sagittal or coronal images were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE/NEX = 2000–3500/80–120 ms/3–4, a 192 × 256 to 512 × 512 matrix, a 14- to 20-cm FOV, a 3-mm section thickness, and a 0.0- to 0.6-mm intersection gap. T1-weighted images after an intravenous injection of contrast medium (0.1 mmol/kg of body weight) were also acquired, except for case 8, in patients with LYH, in the coronal and sagittal planes with the same parameters as those of the T1-weighted images. All patients with LYH had 1–6 follow-up MR imaging studies performed during a period ranging from 1 month to 8 years.

Two neuroradiologists (Y.N., N.S.) who did not know the patients' clinical information evaluated the MR imaging findings of the patients with LYH and pituitary adenoma. In several recent articles, some findings were reported to be useful for distinguishing pituitary adenoma from LYH, such as precontrast homogeneous signal intensity, intact sellar floor, suprasellar extension, loss of PPHI, stalk thickening, mass symmetry, homogeneous enhancement, and adjacent dural enhancement (the so-called dural tail).^{2,3,8,11–14} In this study, evaluation of the precontrast signal intensity was excluded because pituitary adenomas often show complicated signal intensities due to hemorrhagic or cystic changes, and it is a not suitable factor for making a simple assessment. The findings of destruction of the sellar floor and extension to the sphenoid sinus were also excluded because it was obvious that these findings indicate neoplasm. The finding of suprasellar extension was also excluded because it depends on the size of pituitary lesions, and pituitary adenomas vary in size from microadenoma to macroadenoma.

We, therefore, selected the following MR findings as assessment factors: 1) PPHI on T1-weighted images, 2) thickened stalk, 3) pituitary symmetry, 4) pituitary enhancement pattern, 5) the dural tail, and 6) parasellar signal intensity on T2- and T1-weighted images. PPHI was classified as either “identified” or “not identified.”¹⁵ If the diameter of the pituitary stalk exceeded 3.5 mm at the level of the median eminence of the hypothalamus, the stalk was considered “thick.”¹⁶ Pituitary symmetry was classified as either “symmetric” or “asymmetric.”¹⁵ The enhancement pattern was classified as either “homogeneous” or “heterogeneous.” The dural tail was classified as either “identified” or “not identified.” Parasellar signal intensity on T2- and T1-weighted images was classified as either “dark,” “low,” “iso,” or “high” intensity. On T2-weighted images, “dark” was isointense with bone cortex; “low” was isointense with white matter; “iso” was isointense with gray matter, and “high” was hyperintense with gray matter. On T1-weighted images, “dark” was isointense with bone cortex; “low” was isointense with CSF, “iso” was isointense with gray matter, and “high” was hyperintense with gray matter.^12,17 If different signal intensities were detected in the parasellar areas, the lowest signal intensity was adopted. When the 2 neuroradiologists found different results, they discussed the case and came to a decision by consensus. We also reviewed all images of a series of follow-up MR images in patients who showed parasellar dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by using StatView 5.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Between patients with LYH and those with pituitary adenoma, each imaging finding as described above was compared by using the Fisher exact probability test. P values < .05 indicated statistical significance. We also calculated sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of LYH of each imaging finding as described above.

Results

Clinical findings for the 20 patients with LYH are summarized in On-line Table 1. Endocrinologic studies showed that 17 of 20 patients (85%) had some degree of hypopituitarism: panhypopituitarism or partial hypopituitarism with diabetes insipidus in 12 patients, only panhypopituitarism or partial hypopituitarism in 2 patients, and only diabetes insipidus in 3 patients.

Clinical findings for the 22 patients with pituitary adenoma are summarized in On-line Table 2. Endocrinologic studies showed partial hyperpituitarism and partial hypopituitarism in 3 patients, only partial hyperpituitarism in 7 patients, and only hypopituitarism in 1 patient. In 4 patients who had hormonal examination of the posterior lobe, none had diabetes insipidus.

MR imaging findings of the patients with LYH and pituitary adenoma are summarized in On-line Table 3. PPHI was absent in 17 patients (85%) with LYH and 3 (14%) with pituitary adenoma. Ectopic PPHI was seen in 1 patient with LYH and 3 with pituitary adenoma. Seventeen patients (85%) with LYH had thickened stalks. On the other hand, no patients (0%) with pituitary adenoma had thickened stalks, though in 2 patients with LYH and 4 with pituitary adenoma, the stalk was unclear due to pituitary tumoral compression. The pituitary gland was symmetric in 17 patients (85%) with LYH and in 2 (9%) with pituitary adenoma. Homogeneous enhancement was seen in 13 patients (65%) with LYH and in only 2 patients (9%) with pituitary adenoma. The dural tail was seen in 13 patients (65%) with LYH and 17 patients (77%) with pituitary adenoma. On T2-weighted images, parasellar dark-signal-intensity areas were seen in 7 patients (35%) with LYH (Figs 1 –3); the other 13 patients with LYH showed isointensity. Parasellar low-signal-intensity areas were seen in 2 patients (9%) with pituitary adenoma (Fig 4), but no parasellar dark-signal-intensity areas were seen in any patients with pituitary adenoma.

Fig 1.

MR images of LYH (case 1) in a 38-year-old woman with partial hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus. This patient had an 11-month history of headache, vomiting, polyuria, and polydipsia; transsphenoidal biopsy was performed and LYH proved histologically. A, Coronal T2-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 3500/120 ms/3) shows a large pituitary mass compressing the optic chiasm. A dark-signal-intensity area is seen in the cavernous sinus and sellar floor (arrow). B, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 650/16 ms/3) shows a large pituitary mass with homogeneous enhancement. Bilateral cavernous sinuses are swollen, with poor enhancement. The left ICA in the left cavernous sinus is narrowed (arrow).

Fig 2.

MR images of LYH (case 3) in a 70-year-old man with panhypopituitarism without diabetes insipidus. His chief complaint was general fatigue, and he was followed up for >5 years. Replacement therapy (glucocorticoid, levothyroxine) was performed. A, Coronal T2-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 2260/100 ms/3) shows the relatively large pituitary gland. A dark-signal-intensity area is seen around the pituitary gland. The inner portions of the bilateral cavernous sinuses show low signal intensity. B, Coronal T1-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 660/11.2 ms/3) shows the relatively large pituitary gland and stalk. A low-signal-intensity area is seen around the pituitary gland. The stalk shows high signal intensity, suggesting that it is storing antidiuretic hormone (arrow). C, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 600/9.9 ms/3) shows homogeneous enhancement in the pituitary gland and the stalk. The area around the pituitary gland and bilateral cavernous sinuses shows poor enhancement.

Fig 3.

Serial MR images of LYH (case 4) in a 36-year-old man. Partial diabetes insipidus was observed in the early stage, and partial hypopituitarism was revealed later during the follow-up and treated by replacement therapy. A, The first coronal T2-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 3500/120 ms/3) shows the pituitary gland. Very thin dark-signal intensity areas on the upper edge of the pituitary gland (arrows) are seen. B, The first coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 650/16 ms/3) shows a large pituitary gland with homogeneous enhancement. This section is slightly behind A. The large stalk with homogeneous enhancement slightly compresses the optic chiasm. C, The second coronal T2-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 3500/120 ms/3) 2 months after the first study shows a large pituitary gland and stalk. The previously noted thin dark-signal-intensity areas on the upper edge of the pituitary gland (arrows) were thicker than those in the first study. D, The third coronal T2-weighted image (TR/TE/NEX = 3500/120 ms/3) 8 months after the first study shows a large pituitary gland. The stalk is decreased in size. Dark-signal-intensity areas on the upper edge of the pituitary gland have thickened. The dark-signal-intensity area is enlarged and involves the right cavernous sinus; the right ICA in the cavernous sinus is narrower (arrow) than that in the previous study.

Fig 4.

MR images of pituitary adenoma (case 5) in a 54-year-old woman. Acromegaly and partial hyperpituitarism were observed. She was treated with transsphenoidal resection, and the proved pathologic diagnosis was GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. A and B, Coronal T2-weighted images (TR/TE/NEX = 3500/120 ms/3) show a large pituitary mass destroying the sellar floor and extending in the sphenoid sinus. The upper portion of the mass is mixed low intensity, and the lower portion shows mixed high signals. Large arrows indicate small dark-signal-intensity areas in the pituitary mass. A low-signal-intensity margin is seen in the medial aspect of the upper pituitary mass (small arrow). C and D, Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (TR/TE/NEX = 600/9.9 ms/3) show heterogeneous enhancement in the pituitary mass. Arrows indicate enhanced focal areas in the pituitary mass, which correspond to the dark-signal-intensities on the T2-weighted images in A and B.

The other 20 patients with pituitary adenoma showed isointensity. On T1-weighted images, parasellar low-signal-intensity areas were seen in 2 patients (10%) with LYH. The other 18 patients with LYH showed isointensity. On the other hand, all patients with pituitary adenoma showed isointensity. Pituitary adenomas involved the cavernous sinuses in 11 patients; however, the cavernous sinuses were isointense with gray matter on T2- or T1-weighted images, and dark-signal-intensity areas were not seen.

Details of the MR imaging findings in the 7 patients who showed parasellar dark signal intensity on T2-weighted images are summarized in On-line Table 4. Dark-signal-intensity areas in the cavernous sinuses were seen in 6 patients. Cavernous sinuses were swollen in 4 patients (Figs 1 and 2). Enhancement of the cavernous sinuses after an intravenous injection of contrast medium was poor in 3 patients (Figs 1 and 2). ICAs in the cavernous sinuses were narrowed in 3 patients (Figs 1 and 3). In cases 4, 5, and 6, dark-signal-intensity areas in the cavernous sinus were not seen in the first MR imaging study but appeared 2–20 months later. On T2-weighted images, dark-signal-intensity bands around the anterior lobe and/or posterior lobe of the pituitary gland were seen in 4 patients (Fig 3). In case 5, this band was not seen in the first MR imaging study but appeared 20 months later. In case 4, a very thin dark-signal-intensity band was noted on the upper edge of the posterior gland in the first study and was thickened on follow-up studies 2 and 8 months later (Fig 3).

Between patients with LYH and those with pituitary adenoma, a significant difference was identified by statistical analysis for the number of patients with PPHI on T1-weighted images (P < .0001), thickened stalk (P < .0001), pituitary symmetry (P < .0001), homogeneous enhancement (P = .0001; we excluded the cases without contrast enhancement), and dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images (P = .0015). No significant difference was identified for the number of patients with the dural tail (P = .36; we excluded the cases without contrast enhancement) and low-signal-intensity areas on T1-weighted images (P = .11). Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis for LYH were as follows: 0.85 and 0.95 for the loss of PPHI; 0.85 and 0.82 for the thickened stalk; 0.85 and 0.91 for the pituitary symmetry; 0.68 and 0.91 for the homogeneous enhancement (we excluded the cases without contrast enhancement); 0.65 and 0.23 for the dural tail; and 0.35 and 1.00 for the dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images, and 0.10 and 1.00 for the low-signal-intensity areas on T1-weighted images around the sellar and parasellar areas.

Discussion

The present study reviewed a series of clinical and MR imaging findings in 20 patients with LYH. To the best of our knowledge, this study has reviewed original MR imaging findings in the largest number of patients with LYH. We demonstrated a new characteristic parasellar T2 dark sign (dark-signal-intensity area on T2-weighted images around the pituitary gland and in the cavernous sinus) in patients with LYH for the first time. Although sensitivity for the parasellar T2 dark sign was 0.35, lower than that for loss of PPHI, thickened stalk, pituitary symmetry, homogeneous enhancement, or the dural tail, specificity for the parasellar T2 dark sign was 1.00; and this finding was characteristic enough to distinguish with certainty the more common pituitary adenoma from LYH because false-positive cases were not found. T2-weighted images depicted the parasellar involvement of LYH well. Our results also suggest that there are variations of localization of T2 dark areas in LYH.

Some previous studies reported that loss of PPHI, thickened stalk, pituitary symmetry, homogeneous enhancement, and the dural tail were useful for distinguishing LYH from pituitary adenomas,^{2,3,8,11–14} but only 1 previous study investigated this statistically. Gutenberg et al¹⁴ reported that these findings contributed significantly to classifying the outcome as pituitary adenoma or autoimmune hypophysitis (including lymphocytic and granulomatous hypophysitis), and our results were consistent with their findings.¹⁴

Although MR imaging findings such as loss of PPHI, thickened stalk, pituitary symmetry, and homogeneous enhancement showed significant difference in the statistical analysis in the present study, these findings were nonspecific and were observed in both diseases. Loss of PPHI was observed in central diabetes insipidus due to idiopathic, inflammatory, or neoplastic processes, including pituitary adenoma.^8,18–23 The stalk was sometimes unclear due to pituitary tumoral compression. Pituitary symmetry or asymmetry depends on tumor size, location, or invading areas.²⁴ Cystic, necrotizing, or hemorrhagic changes also influence the enhancement pattern.²⁵ Cystic appearance was described in 5% of the patients with LYH.^{1,8,11,12,26–34} Homogeneous enhancement can also be observed in pituitary adenomas.³⁵ On the other hand, parasellar T2 dark sign was a characteristic finding in LYH and can contribute to distinguishing pituitary LYH from adenoma with certainty.

Clinical findings revealed that panhypopituitarism or partial hypopituitarism was seen in 17 patients (85%) with LYH. On the other hand, partial hypopituitarism was seen in only 4 patients (18%) with pituitary adenoma. We think that hypopituitarism may be useful clinical information, suggesting LYH rather than pituitary adenoma. The endocrinologic manifestation of LYH can vary widely, from only hyperprolactinemia, probably due to stalk compression, to panhypopituitarism mimicking Sheehan syndrome.¹ In a recent report, the hormones most frequently impaired were ACTH, followed by TSH, LH/FSH, and vasopressin in patients with LYH.⁸ On the other hand, hypogonadism rather than hypocortisolemia or diabetes insipidus is usually the initial problem in pituitary adenoma.⁴ In the present study, ACTH deficiency was seen in only 2 of 13 patients with LYH who had partial hypopituitarism, and insufficient hormones of the anterior pituitary lobe had some overlaps between pituitary adenoma and LYH. Isolated ACTH deficiency is not specific to LYH because it can be observed in the absence of LYH,³⁶ and isolated deficiencies of other anterior pituitary hormones have been described in LYH.³⁷ We think that MR imaging findings, in addition to endocrinologic studies, can play an important role in distinguishing pituitary adenoma from LYH.

In the previous reports, histopathologic analysis revealed that LYH is extensively infiltrated by lymphoplasmacytic cells, consisting of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages.³ Lymphoplasmacytic aggregates surround the atrophic acini of pituitary cells, whereas the remaining pituitary tissue showed areas of reactive fibrosis.^26,38 Caturegli et al⁸ reported that fibrosis was common (47% of 267 cases of LYH) and often severe in their pathologic review. We think that dark-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images around the pituitary gland and in the cavernous sinus reflected fibrotic changes accompanied by infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells. In the present study, the parasellar T2 dark signs were seen in the first MR imaging study in the 5 patients with LYH; however, this sign was not seen in the first MR imaging study of the 2 patients with LYH, but appeared 2–20 months after the first MR imaging study (On-line Table 4).

LYH is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the pituitary gland and parasellar areas, and the duration of disease in patients with LYH is relatively long.³ We think that fibrotic changes progressed in the clinical course of LYH and appeared as parasellar T2 dark signs. We also think that the sensitivity and specificity of the parasellar T2 dark sign may vary with time, and thus the parasellar T2 dark sign may not be useful for making an initial diagnosis. If the parasellar T2 dark sign was not seen in the initial MR imaging in patients who were suspected of the diagnosis of LYH, further follow-up MR imaging studies may be needed to detect the sign.

In the present study, cases 1 and 2 were diagnosed histologically by transsphenoidal biopsy. In case 2, biopsy specimens showed adenohypophysitis with focal lymphocytic infiltrate with lymphoid follicle formation and attached portions of attenuated hyalinized fibrous tissue; however, fibrous tissue was not found in case 1. We think the reason is that the biopsy specimens included only a small portion of the anterior lobes and did not include fibrous tissue. In the previous reports, approximately 10% of pituitary adenomas contained fibrosis.³⁹ Iuchi et al⁴⁰ reported that the signal intensities on T2-weighted images were significantly correlated with the percentage of collagen content of the pituitary adenomas, and adenomas that showed lower signal intensities on T2-weighted images contained more collagen. However, low signal intensities on T2-weighted images in pituitary adenomas are usually seen in the pituitary masses and not outside the masses in the parasellar areas. However, the histopathologic findings of LYH were characterized by massive infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells followed by necrosis or surrounding parenchymal fibrosis.⁴¹ Therefore, the parasellar T2 dark sign is more suitable for LYH that infiltrates around the pituitary. Some previous studies have reported cavernous involvement in patients with LYH,^{5,6,10,42–46} but no studies have mentioned the parasellar T2 dark sign.

In the present study, we focused on the parasellar T2 dark sign in the differential diagnosis between LYH and pituitary adenoma; however, other differential diagnoses for parasellar T2 dark sign should be considered in practical clinical cases. Some cases such as sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or Tolosa-Hunt syndrome could potentially have relatively low signal intensity on T2-weighted images and may show findings similar to those of the parasellar T2 dark sign, though we have no experience of such cases. In particular, sarcoidosis should be carefully considered because it sometimes causes secondary granulomatous hypophysitis,⁴ and its differential diagnosis on MR imaging findings may be very difficult. We think that clinical presentation such as medical history and laboratory findings, in addition to MR imaging findings, needs to be investigated in detail in the diagnosis of LYH.

This study had several limitations. The first is that not all patients with LYH had pathologic confirmation; only 4 of 20 patients with LYH and only 2 of 7 patients with parasellar T2 dark sign had transsphenoidal biopsy. Additionally, there were 5 patients who had a history of autoimmune disease such as IgG4-related disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, and bullous pemphigoid. Other disorders, such as granulomatous hypophysitis or sarcoidosis, could feasibly have similar MR imaging findings. However, the duration of follow-up was relatively long (from 9 months to 9 years) in the 11 patients without pathologic confirmation or a history of autoimmune disease. Sarcoidosis is liable to recur not only in the intracranial area but also in the extracranial portion during longitudinal follow-up, but these 11 patients had no recurrence. In addition, they had no laboratory findings supporting sarcoidosis. Granulomatous hypophysitis is an extremely rare disorder (annual incidence of 1 in 10 million) and is usually diagnosed in postmortem specimens.^4,47 The other limitation was that the present study was retrospective; most of the patients had only had a routine pituitary MR imaging study. If we had been able to prospectively evaluate these patients by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging⁵ or contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state,⁴⁸ more details of the sellar and parasellar structures and signal intensity would have been shown. Further prospective studies that compare the findings obtained from high-field MR imaging systems or long-term follow-up MR imaging with the histopathologic findings should be conducted.

Conclusions

MR imaging findings, such as loss of PPHI, thickened stalk, pituitary symmetry, homogeneous enhancement, and parasellar T2 dark sign, can contribute to distinguishing pituitary adenoma from LYH. The parasellar T2 dark sign in particular was a characteristic finding in patients with LYH, which was not observed in pituitary adenomas.

Footnotes

Indicates article with supplemental on-line tables.

References

1.↵
1. Thodou E,
2. Asa SL,
3. Kontogeorgos G,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: clinicopathological findings. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:2302–11
CrossRef PubMed
2.↵
1. Powrie JK,
2. Powell M,
3. Ayers AB,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: magnetic resonance imaging features of two new cases and a review of the literature. Clin Endocrinol 1995;42:315–22
PubMed
3.↵
1. Bellastella A,
2. Bizzarro A,
3. Coronella C,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: a rare or underestimated disease? Eur J Endocrinol 2003;149:363–76
Abstract
4.↵
1. Rivera JA
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: disease spectrum and approach to diagnosis and therapy. Pituitary 2006;9:35–45
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
1. Sato N,
2. Sze G,
3. Endo K
. Hypophysitis: endocrinologic and dynamic MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:439–44
Abstract
6.↵
1. Supler ML,
2. Mickle JP
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: report of a case in a man with cavernous sinus involvement. Surg Neurol 1992;37:472–76
CrossRef PubMed
7.↵
1. Imura H,
2. Nakao K,
3. Shimatsu A,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic infundibuloneurohypophysitis as a cause of central diabetes insipidus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:683–89
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
1. Caturegli P,
2. Newschaffer C,
3. Olivi A,
4. et al
. Autoimmune hypophysitis. Endocr Rev 2005;26:599–614
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
1. Leung GK,
2. Lopes MB,
3. Thorner MO,
4. et al
. Primary hypophysitis: a single-center experience in 16 cases. J Neurosurg 2004;101:262–71
PubMed
10.↵
1. Nussbaum CE,
2. Okawara S,
3. Jacobs LS
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis with involvement of the cavernous sinus and hypothalamus. Neurosurgery 1991;28:440–44
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
1. Saiwai S,
2. Inoue Y,
3. Ishihara T,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: skull radiographs and MRI. Neuroradiology 1998;40:114–20
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
1. Ahmadi J,
2. Meyers GS,
3. Segall HD,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: contrast-enhanced MR imaging in five cases. Radiology 1995;195:30–34
PubMed
13.↵
1. Chelaifa K,
2. Bouzaidi K,
3. Harzallah F,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis. J Neuroradiol 2002;29:57–60
PubMed
14.↵
1. Gutenberg A,
2. Larsen J,
3. Lupi I,
4. et al
. A radiologic score to distinguish autoimmune hypophysitis from nonsecreting pituitary adenoma preoperatively. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1766–72
Abstract/FREE Full Text
15.↵
1. Kucharczyk W,
2. Davis DO,
3. Kelly WM,
4. et al
. Pituitary adenomas: high resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1986;161:761–5
PubMed
16.↵
1. Leggett DA,
2. Hill PT,
3. Anderson RJ
. ‘Stalkitis' in a pregnant 32-year-old woman: a rare cause of diabetes insipidus. Australas Radiol 1999;43:104–07
CrossRef PubMed
17.↵
1. Johnsen DE,
2. Woodruff WW,
3. Allen IS,
4. et al
. MR imaging of the sellar and juxtasellar regions. Radiographics 1991;11:727–58
PubMed
18.↵
1. Terano T,
2. Seya A,
3. Tamura Y,
4. et al
. Characteristics of the pituitary gland in elderly subjects from magnetic resonance imaging: relationship to pituitary hormone secretion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996;45:273–79
CrossRef PubMed
19.↵
1. Fujisawa I,
2. Nishimura K,
3. Asato R,
4. et al
. Posterior lobe of the pituitary in diabetes insipidus: MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:221–25
PubMed
20.↵
1. Sato N,
2. Ishizaka H,
3. Matsumoto M,
4. et al
. MR detectability of posterior pituitary high signal and direction of frequency encoding gradient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:355–58
PubMed
21.↵
1. Sato N,
2. Ishizaka H,
3. Yagi H,
4. et al
. Posterior lobe of the pituitary in diabetes insipidus: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:357–60
PubMed
22.↵
1. Sato N,
2. Endo K,
3. Ishizaka H,
4. et al
. Serial MR intensity changes of the posterior pituitary in a patient with anorexia nervosa, high serum ADH, and oliguria. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:648–50
PubMed
23.↵
1. Sato N,
2. Endo K,
3. Kawai H,
4. et al
. Hemodialysis: relationship between signal intensity of the posterior pituitary gland at MR imaging and level of plasma antidiuretic hormone. Radiology 1995;194:277–80
PubMed
24.↵
1. Chong BW,
2. Kucharczyk W,
3. Singer W,
4. et al
. Pituitary gland MR: a comparative study of healthy volunteers and patients with microadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:675–79
Abstract/FREE Full Text
25.↵
1. Bonneville JF,
2. Bonneville F,
3. Cattin F
. Magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary adenomas. Eur Radiol 2005;15:543–48
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
1. Fehn M,
2. Sommer C,
3. Ludecke DK,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: light and microscopic findings and correlation to clinical appearance. Endocr Pathol 1998;9:71–78
PubMed
27.↵
1. Sandler R,
2. Danks KR,
3. Hennigan SH,
4. et al
. The widening spectrum of lymphocytic hypophysitis. J Ark Med Soc 1998;95:197–200
PubMed
28.↵
1. Ishihara T,
2. Hino M,
3. Kurahachi H,
4. et al
. Long-term clinical course of two cases of lymphocytic adenohypophysitis. Endocr J 1996;43:433–40
PubMed
29.↵
1. McDermott MW,
2. Griesdale DE,
3. Berry K,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis. Can J Neurol Sci 1988;15:38–43
PubMed
30.↵
1. Farah JO,
2. Rossi M,
3. Foy PM,
4. et al
. Cystic lymphocytic hypophysitis, visual field defects and hypopituitarism. Int J Clin Pract 1999;53:643–44
PubMed
31.↵
1. Tamiya A,
2. Saeki N,
3. Kubota M,
4. et al
. Unusual MRI findings in lymphocytic hypophysitis with central diabetes insipidus. Neuroradiology 1999;41:899–900
CrossRef PubMed
32.↵
1. Flanagan DE,
2. Ibrahim AE,
3. Ellison DW,
4. et al
. Inflammatory hypophysitis: the spectrum of disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:47–56
CrossRef PubMed
33.↵
1. Lee SJ,
2. Yoo HJ,
3. Park SW,
4. et al
. A case of cystic lymphocytic hypophysitis with cacosmia and hypopituitarism. Endocr J 2004;51:375–80
CrossRef PubMed
34.↵
1. Pérez-Núñez A,
2. Miranda P,
3. Arrese I,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis with cystic MRI appearance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:1297–300
CrossRef PubMed
35.↵
1. Heshmati HM,
2. Kujas M,
3. Casanova S,
4. et al
. Prevalence of lymphocytic infiltrate in 1400 pituitary adenomas. Endocr J 1998;45:357–61
PubMed
36.↵
1. Nagai Y,
2. Ieki Y,
3. Ohsawa K,
4. et al
. Simultaneously found transient hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto's thyroiditis, autoimmune hepatitis and isolated ACTH deficiency after cessation of glucocorticoid administration. Endocr J 1997;44:453–8
PubMed
37.↵
1. Barkan AL,
2. Kelch RP,
3. Marshall JC
. Isolated gonadotrope failure in the polyglandular autoimmune syndrome. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1535–40
PubMed
38.↵
1. Durán Martınez M,
2. Santonja C,
3. Pavon de Paz I,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: report of an unusual case of a rare disorder. J Endocrinol Invest 2001;24:190–93
PubMed
39.↵
1. Wang H,
2. Li WS,
3. Shi DJ,
4. et al
. Correlation of MMP(1) and TIMP (1) expression with pituitary adenoma fibrosis. J Neurooncol 2008;90:151–56
CrossRef PubMed
40.↵
1. Iuchi T,
2. Saeki N,
3. Tanaka M,
4. et al
. MRI prediction of fibrous pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:779–86
CrossRef PubMed
41.↵
1. Nishioka H,
2. Ito H,
3. Miki T,
4. et al
. A case of lymphocytic hypophysitis with massive fibrosis and the role of surgical intervention. Surg Neurol 1994;42:74–78
CrossRef PubMed
42.↵
1. Kartal I,
2. Yarman S,
3. Tanakol R,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic panhypophysitis in a young man with involvement of the cavernous sinus and clivus. Pituitary 2007;10:75–80
CrossRef PubMed
43.↵
1. Melgar MA,
2. Mariwalla N,
3. Gloss DS,
4. et al
. Recurrent lymphocytic hypophysitis and bilateral intracavernous carotid artery occlusion: an observation and review of the literature. Neurol Res 2006;28:177–83
CrossRef PubMed
44.↵
1. Lecube A,
2. Francisco G,
3. Rodríguez D,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis successfully treated with azathioprine: first case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1581–83
Abstract/FREE Full Text
45.↵
1. Tubridy N,
2. Saunders D,
3. Thom M,
4. et al
. Infundibulohypophysitis in a man presenting with diabetes insipidus and cavernous sinus involvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:798–801
Abstract/FREE Full Text
46.↵
1. Nakamura Y,
2. Okada H,
3. Wada Y,
4. et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: its expanding features. J Endocrinol Invest 2001;24:262–67
PubMed
47.↵
1. Cheung CC,
2. Ezzat S,
3. Smyth HS,
4. et al
. The spectrum and significance of primary hypophysitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1048–53
CrossRef PubMed
48.↵
1. Yagi A,
2. Sato N,
3. Taketomi A,
4. et al
. Normal cranial nerves in the cavernous sinuses: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:946–50
Abstract/FREE Full Text

Received March 9, 2010.
Accepted after revision May 10, 2010.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Show more HEAD AND NECK

[1] 1.↵
Thodou E,
Asa SL,
Kontogeorgos G,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: clinicopathological findings. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:2302–11
CrossRef PubMed

[2] Thodou E,

[3] Asa SL,

[4] Kontogeorgos G,

[5] et al

[6] 2.↵
Powrie JK,
Powell M,
Ayers AB,
et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: magnetic resonance imaging features of two new cases and a review of the literature. Clin Endocrinol 1995;42:315–22
PubMed

[7] Powrie JK,

[8] Powell M,

[9] Ayers AB,

[10] et al

[11] 3.↵
Bellastella A,
Bizzarro A,
Coronella C,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: a rare or underestimated disease? Eur J Endocrinol 2003;149:363–76
Abstract

[12] Bellastella A,

[13] Bizzarro A,

[14] Coronella C,

[15] et al

[16] 4.↵
Rivera JA
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: disease spectrum and approach to diagnosis and therapy. Pituitary 2006;9:35–45
CrossRef PubMed

[17] Rivera JA

[18] 5.↵
Sato N,
Sze G,
Endo K
. Hypophysitis: endocrinologic and dynamic MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:439–44
Abstract

[19] Sato N,

[20] Sze G,

[21] Endo K

[22] 6.↵
Supler ML,
Mickle JP
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: report of a case in a man with cavernous sinus involvement. Surg Neurol 1992;37:472–76
CrossRef PubMed

[23] Supler ML,

[24] Mickle JP

[25] 7.↵
Imura H,
Nakao K,
Shimatsu A,
et al
. Lymphocytic infundibuloneurohypophysitis as a cause of central diabetes insipidus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:683–89
CrossRef PubMed

[26] Imura H,

[27] Nakao K,

[28] Shimatsu A,

[29] et al

[30] 8.↵
Caturegli P,
Newschaffer C,
Olivi A,
et al
. Autoimmune hypophysitis. Endocr Rev 2005;26:599–614
CrossRef PubMed

[31] Caturegli P,

[32] Newschaffer C,

[33] Olivi A,

[34] et al

[35] 9.↵
Leung GK,
Lopes MB,
Thorner MO,
et al
. Primary hypophysitis: a single-center experience in 16 cases. J Neurosurg 2004;101:262–71
PubMed

[36] Leung GK,

[37] Lopes MB,

[38] Thorner MO,

[39] et al

[40] 10.↵
Nussbaum CE,
Okawara S,
Jacobs LS
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis with involvement of the cavernous sinus and hypothalamus. Neurosurgery 1991;28:440–44
CrossRef PubMed

[41] Nussbaum CE,

[42] Okawara S,

[43] Jacobs LS

[44] 11.↵
Saiwai S,
Inoue Y,
Ishihara T,
et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: skull radiographs and MRI. Neuroradiology 1998;40:114–20
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Saiwai S,

[46] Inoue Y,

[47] Ishihara T,

[48] et al

[49] 12.↵
Ahmadi J,
Meyers GS,
Segall HD,
et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis: contrast-enhanced MR imaging in five cases. Radiology 1995;195:30–34
PubMed

[50] Ahmadi J,

[51] Meyers GS,

[52] Segall HD,

[53] et al

[54] 13.↵
Chelaifa K,
Bouzaidi K,
Harzallah F,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis. J Neuroradiol 2002;29:57–60
PubMed

[55] Chelaifa K,

[56] Bouzaidi K,

[57] Harzallah F,

[58] et al

[59] 14.↵
Gutenberg A,
Larsen J,
Lupi I,
et al
. A radiologic score to distinguish autoimmune hypophysitis from nonsecreting pituitary adenoma preoperatively. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1766–72
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[60] Gutenberg A,

[61] Larsen J,

[62] Lupi I,

[63] et al

[64] 15.↵
Kucharczyk W,
Davis DO,
Kelly WM,
et al
. Pituitary adenomas: high resolution MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1986;161:761–5
PubMed

[65] Kucharczyk W,

[66] Davis DO,

[67] Kelly WM,

[68] et al

[69] 16.↵
Leggett DA,
Hill PT,
Anderson RJ
. ‘Stalkitis' in a pregnant 32-year-old woman: a rare cause of diabetes insipidus. Australas Radiol 1999;43:104–07
CrossRef PubMed

[70] Leggett DA,

[71] Hill PT,

[72] Anderson RJ

[73] 17.↵
Johnsen DE,
Woodruff WW,
Allen IS,
et al
. MR imaging of the sellar and juxtasellar regions. Radiographics 1991;11:727–58
PubMed

[74] Johnsen DE,

[75] Woodruff WW,

[76] Allen IS,

[77] et al

[78] 18.↵
Terano T,
Seya A,
Tamura Y,
et al
. Characteristics of the pituitary gland in elderly subjects from magnetic resonance imaging: relationship to pituitary hormone secretion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996;45:273–79
CrossRef PubMed

[79] Terano T,

[80] Seya A,

[81] Tamura Y,

[82] et al

[83] 19.↵
Fujisawa I,
Nishimura K,
Asato R,
et al
. Posterior lobe of the pituitary in diabetes insipidus: MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:221–25
PubMed

[84] Fujisawa I,

[85] Nishimura K,

[86] Asato R,

[87] et al

[88] 20.↵
Sato N,
Ishizaka H,
Matsumoto M,
et al
. MR detectability of posterior pituitary high signal and direction of frequency encoding gradient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:355–58
PubMed

[89] Sato N,

[90] Ishizaka H,

[91] Matsumoto M,

[92] et al

[93] 21.↵
Sato N,
Ishizaka H,
Yagi H,
et al
. Posterior lobe of the pituitary in diabetes insipidus: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:357–60
PubMed

[94] Sato N,

[95] Ishizaka H,

[96] Yagi H,

[97] et al

[98] 22.↵
Sato N,
Endo K,
Ishizaka H,
et al
. Serial MR intensity changes of the posterior pituitary in a patient with anorexia nervosa, high serum ADH, and oliguria. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:648–50
PubMed

[99] Sato N,

[100] Endo K,

[101] Ishizaka H,

[102] et al

[103] 23.↵
Sato N,
Endo K,
Kawai H,
et al
. Hemodialysis: relationship between signal intensity of the posterior pituitary gland at MR imaging and level of plasma antidiuretic hormone. Radiology 1995;194:277–80
PubMed

[104] Sato N,

[105] Endo K,

[106] Kawai H,

[107] et al

[108] 24.↵
Chong BW,
Kucharczyk W,
Singer W,
et al
. Pituitary gland MR: a comparative study of healthy volunteers and patients with microadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:675–79
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[109] Chong BW,

[110] Kucharczyk W,

[111] Singer W,

[112] et al

[113] 25.↵
Bonneville JF,
Bonneville F,
Cattin F
. Magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary adenomas. Eur Radiol 2005;15:543–48
CrossRef PubMed

[114] Bonneville JF,

[115] Bonneville F,

[116] Cattin F

[117] 26.↵
Fehn M,
Sommer C,
Ludecke DK,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: light and microscopic findings and correlation to clinical appearance. Endocr Pathol 1998;9:71–78
PubMed

[118] Fehn M,

[119] Sommer C,

[120] Ludecke DK,

[121] et al

[122] 27.↵
Sandler R,
Danks KR,
Hennigan SH,
et al
. The widening spectrum of lymphocytic hypophysitis. J Ark Med Soc 1998;95:197–200
PubMed

[123] Sandler R,

[124] Danks KR,

[125] Hennigan SH,

[126] et al

[127] 28.↵
Ishihara T,
Hino M,
Kurahachi H,
et al
. Long-term clinical course of two cases of lymphocytic adenohypophysitis. Endocr J 1996;43:433–40
PubMed

[128] Ishihara T,

[129] Hino M,

[130] Kurahachi H,

[131] et al

[132] 29.↵
McDermott MW,
Griesdale DE,
Berry K,
et al
. Lymphocytic adenohypophysitis. Can J Neurol Sci 1988;15:38–43
PubMed

[133] McDermott MW,

[134] Griesdale DE,

[135] Berry K,

[136] et al

[137] 30.↵
Farah JO,
Rossi M,
Foy PM,
et al
. Cystic lymphocytic hypophysitis, visual field defects and hypopituitarism. Int J Clin Pract 1999;53:643–44
PubMed

[138] Farah JO,

[139] Rossi M,

[140] Foy PM,

[141] et al

[142] 31.↵
Tamiya A,
Saeki N,
Kubota M,
et al
. Unusual MRI findings in lymphocytic hypophysitis with central diabetes insipidus. Neuroradiology 1999;41:899–900
CrossRef PubMed

[143] Tamiya A,

[144] Saeki N,

[145] Kubota M,

[146] et al

[147] 32.↵
Flanagan DE,
Ibrahim AE,
Ellison DW,
et al
. Inflammatory hypophysitis: the spectrum of disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:47–56
CrossRef PubMed

[148] Flanagan DE,

[149] Ibrahim AE,

[150] Ellison DW,

[151] et al

[152] 33.↵
Lee SJ,
Yoo HJ,
Park SW,
et al
. A case of cystic lymphocytic hypophysitis with cacosmia and hypopituitarism. Endocr J 2004;51:375–80
CrossRef PubMed

[153] Lee SJ,

[154] Yoo HJ,

[155] Park SW,

[156] et al

[157] 34.↵
Pérez-Núñez A,
Miranda P,
Arrese I,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis with cystic MRI appearance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:1297–300
CrossRef PubMed

[158] Pérez-Núñez A,

[159] Miranda P,

[160] Arrese I,

[161] et al

[162] 35.↵
Heshmati HM,
Kujas M,
Casanova S,
et al
. Prevalence of lymphocytic infiltrate in 1400 pituitary adenomas. Endocr J 1998;45:357–61
PubMed

[163] Heshmati HM,

[164] Kujas M,

[165] Casanova S,

[166] et al

[167] 36.↵
Nagai Y,
Ieki Y,
Ohsawa K,
et al
. Simultaneously found transient hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto's thyroiditis, autoimmune hepatitis and isolated ACTH deficiency after cessation of glucocorticoid administration. Endocr J 1997;44:453–8
PubMed

[168] Nagai Y,

[169] Ieki Y,

[170] Ohsawa K,

[171] et al

[172] 37.↵
Barkan AL,
Kelch RP,
Marshall JC
. Isolated gonadotrope failure in the polyglandular autoimmune syndrome. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1535–40
PubMed

[173] Barkan AL,

[174] Kelch RP,

[175] Marshall JC

[176] 38.↵
Durán Martınez M,
Santonja C,
Pavon de Paz I,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: report of an unusual case of a rare disorder. J Endocrinol Invest 2001;24:190–93
PubMed

[177] Durán Martınez M,

[178] Santonja C,

[179] Pavon de Paz I,

[180] et al

[181] 39.↵
Wang H,
Li WS,
Shi DJ,
et al
. Correlation of MMP(1) and TIMP (1) expression with pituitary adenoma fibrosis. J Neurooncol 2008;90:151–56
CrossRef PubMed

[182] Wang H,

[183] Li WS,

[184] Shi DJ,

[185] et al

[186] 40.↵
Iuchi T,
Saeki N,
Tanaka M,
et al
. MRI prediction of fibrous pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:779–86
CrossRef PubMed

[187] Iuchi T,

[188] Saeki N,

[189] Tanaka M,

[190] et al

[191] 41.↵
Nishioka H,
Ito H,
Miki T,
et al
. A case of lymphocytic hypophysitis with massive fibrosis and the role of surgical intervention. Surg Neurol 1994;42:74–78
CrossRef PubMed

[192] Nishioka H,

[193] Ito H,

[194] Miki T,

[195] et al

[196] 42.↵
Kartal I,
Yarman S,
Tanakol R,
et al
. Lymphocytic panhypophysitis in a young man with involvement of the cavernous sinus and clivus. Pituitary 2007;10:75–80
CrossRef PubMed

[197] Kartal I,

[198] Yarman S,

[199] Tanakol R,

[200] et al

[201] 43.↵
Melgar MA,
Mariwalla N,
Gloss DS,
et al
. Recurrent lymphocytic hypophysitis and bilateral intracavernous carotid artery occlusion: an observation and review of the literature. Neurol Res 2006;28:177–83
CrossRef PubMed

[202] Melgar MA,

[203] Mariwalla N,

[204] Gloss DS,

[205] et al

[206] 44.↵
Lecube A,
Francisco G,
Rodríguez D,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis successfully treated with azathioprine: first case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1581–83
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[207] Lecube A,

[208] Francisco G,

[209] Rodríguez D,

[210] et al

[211] 45.↵
Tubridy N,
Saunders D,
Thom M,
et al
. Infundibulohypophysitis in a man presenting with diabetes insipidus and cavernous sinus involvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:798–801
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[212] Tubridy N,

[213] Saunders D,

[214] Thom M,

[215] et al

[216] 46.↵
Nakamura Y,
Okada H,
Wada Y,
et al
. Lymphocytic hypophysitis: its expanding features. J Endocrinol Invest 2001;24:262–67
PubMed

[217] Nakamura Y,

[218] Okada H,

[219] Wada Y,

[220] et al

[221] 47.↵
Cheung CC,
Ezzat S,
Smyth HS,
et al
. The spectrum and significance of primary hypophysitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1048–53
CrossRef PubMed

[222] Cheung CC,

[223] Ezzat S,

[224] Smyth HS,

[225] et al

[226] 48.↵
Yagi A,
Sato N,
Taketomi A,
et al
. Normal cranial nerves in the cavernous sinuses: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:946–50
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[227] Yagi A,

[228] Sato N,

[229] Taketomi A,

[230] et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Parasellar T2 Dark Sign on MR Imaging in Patients with Lymphocytic Hypophysitis

Abstract

Abbreviations

Materials and Methods

Patients

MR Imaging Acquisition

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Parasellar T2 Dark Sign on MR Imaging in Patients with Lymphocytic Hypophysitis

Abstract

Abbreviations

Materials and Methods

Patients

MR Imaging Acquisition

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology