Metal Artifact Reduction for Clipping and Coiling in Interventional C-Arm CT

D. Prell; Y. Kyriakou; T. Struffert; A. Dörfler; W.A. Kalender

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1883

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metallic implants induce massive artifacts in CT images which deteriorate image quality and often superimpose structures of interest. The purpose of this study was to apply and evaluate a dedicated MAR method for neuroradiologic intracranial clips and detachable platinum coiling events. We here report the first clinical results for MAR in FDCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: FDCT volume scans of several patients treated with endovascular coiling or intracranial clipping were corrected by using a dedicated FDCT MAR correction algorithm combined with an edge-preserving attenuation-normalization method in the projection space. Corrected and uncorrected images were compared by 2 experienced radiologists and evaluated for several image-quality features.

RESULTS: After application of our algorithm, implant delineation and visibility were highly improved. CT values compared with values in metal artifact−unaffected areas showed good agreement (average correction of 1300 HU). Image noise was reduced overall by 27%. Intracranial hemorrhage in the direct surroundings of the implanted coil or clip material was displayed without worrisome metal artifacts, and our algorithm even allowed diagnosis in areas where extensive information losses were seen. The high spatial resolution provided by FDCT imaging was well preserved.

CONCLUSIONS: Our MAR method provided metal artifact−reduced images in every studied case. It reduced image noise and corrected CT values to levels comparable with images measured without metallic implants. An overall improvement of brain tissue modeling and implant visibility was achieved. MAR in neuroradiologic FDCT imaging is a promising step forward for better image quality and diagnosis in the presence of metallic implants.

Abbreviations

COR: center of rotation
FD: flat panel detector
FDCT: flat panel detector CT
LI: linear interpolation
MAR: metal artifact reduction
max: maximum
ROI: region of interest

Diagnostic and interventional neuroradiologic applications have profited from the availability of innovative developments such as FDs in rotational C-arm−based FDCT.^1–6 Applications of FDCT range from imaging of intracranial hemorrhage to neurovascular imaging and interventions (ie, intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations) to spinal imaging and interventions.^1,6–9 Especially since the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial^5,10 and the establishment of endovascular coiling as the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms, FDCT became a novel alternative to postinterventional CT.^5,11–13 It offers not only higher spatial resolution in volumetric imaging compared with conventional CT but also rapid visualization of periprocedural hemorrhage and, therefore, improved rapid complication management without the need for patient transfer.¹³ This is necessary because management within 30 minutes will improve the patient's outcome.¹⁴ Nevertheless, artifacts induced by metallic objects, (ie, clips and detachable coils) reduce image quality and may prevent proper diagnosis of areas close to the implants, (ie, recognition and management of complications such as rebleedings or the rupture of an aneurysm during endovascular treatment).⁵

Although many attempts for MAR in conventional CT were made, most algorithms did not provide sufficient quality to be accepted for clinical application.^15–17 Also, the published correction algorithms were based on simple sinogram manipulations (ie, 1D linear interpolation of metal traces)¹⁸ and, therefore, were not compatible with modern FDs, which use Feldkamp-type reconstruction.¹⁹ A novel approach recently presented by Prell et al²⁰ tackles the problem of metal artifacts by using an interpolation-based 3D correction algorithm in the raw data. We present a novel approach for reducing metal-induced artifacts in neuroradiologic applications, focusing on artifacts caused by clips and coils, especially designed for FD datasets. The corrections were applied to neuroradiologic CT images for improvements in implant and brain-tissue modeling to achieve an overall image quality improvement.

Materials and Methods

Equipment

All investigations were performed by using an Axiom Artis dBA C-arm system (Siemens Healthcare Sector, Forchheim, Germany) for aquisition. The system is equipped with biplane imaging components, from which only 1 was used for CT imaging. The FD has an active area of 40 × 30 cm² (pixel size of 308 μm at 2 × 2 pixel binning, CsI[Tl] a:Si). The system geometry allows a reconstruction of a nontruncated volume of approximately 22 cm (in-plane) and 16 cm (in the z-direction). Figure 1A, -B illustrates the system, its geometry, and the reconstructable FOV. All acquisitions were performed by using the embedded high-quality DynaCT scan (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) protocols with an aquisition range of 200° (20 seconds for acquisition, 1240 × 960 projection matrix, 0.4° angular increment) and 496 projections. The detector entrance-dose setting was routinely a value of 1.2 μGy/projection. The respective raw data were reconstructed with the dedicated reconstruction software ImpactFD (VAMP, Erlangen, Germany), by using a smooth kernel typical for the evaluation of bleeding.

Fig 1.

Photograph of the system in use (Axiom Artis dBA, Siemens Healthcare Sector) and a diagram of its geometry. RF and RD correspond to the distance from the focal spot to the COR and from the detector to the COR respectively. R(x,y,z) defines the position in the x/y and x/z-plane, and p(u,v), the corresponding attenuation value measured by the respective detector pixel.

MAR Algorithm

The MAR algorithm used here was based on the correction scheme described in Prell et al.²⁰ We extended this correction method by combining it with an edge-preserving attenuation-normalization procedure in the raw data domain.^21,22 The principle behind the proposed method is to start with a first reconstruction of the acquired raw data and then subsequently improve the MAR. In a first step, metal artifacts are largely reduced by interpolating the metal traces in the raw data domain, followed by a second Feldkamp reconstruction.¹⁹ The second correction step uses the attenuation-normalization procedure to include edge information, which is generally lost after interpolation. In a final combination procedure, the metal implants are reinserted into the corrected image. The quasi-iterative correction scheme is shown step-by-step in Fig 2.

Fig 2.

Diagram of the combination procedure. The first step corresponds to the initial reconstruction; the second step, to the first correction by using 3D LI; and the third step, to the attenuation-normalization correction. The combination procedure reinserts the metal implants into the corrected image. Arrow 1 shows a Guglielmi (Boston Scientific) detachable coil. Arrow 2 indicates metal artifacts and the subsequent reduction of these perturbations.

Metal Detection and First Correction Step

The metal detection in the initially reconstructed image is performed by first smoothing the image by a gaussian filter^20,23 to minimize the effect of mistakenly detecting artifacts as implant geometry. A perspective forward projection of the obtained subvolumes efficiently detects the metal implants in the raw data. A complete detection in the raw data without reconstructing an initial image has been shown to yield unsatisfactory results.^18,20 The 3D LI correction algorithm uses the 3D raw data space to calculate surrogate data for the detected metal traces. The efficiency of detecting the metal implants in the raw data strongly depends on the accuracy of the geometry calibration of the system used for the forward projection and the size of the initial reconstruction. To avoid an insufficient interpolation of the metal traces due to a too small reconstructed initial image or misalignment in the geometry calibration of the system, we used an interpolation width to set the starting and ending points of the interpolation. For our method, a width of Δn = 3 detector pixels was chosen. This results in a maximal transition area in the corrected image of approximately 0.6 mm from the implant to the unchanged tissue according to

where R_F is the distance from the COR to the focus and R_FD is the distance from the focus to the detector (Fig 1B). Only CT values and resolution in the transition area are subject to noticeable influences by the interpolation scheme and, therefore, have to be considered separately.

The extensive spreading of metal artifacts in the reconstructed image is mainly caused by the Feldkamp reconstruction, which nonlinearily amplifies beam-hardening artifacts, scattered radiation, and photon starvation. By pragmatically interpolating the contaminated metal traces and thus replacing them with surrogate attenuation values, using attenuation values surrounding the metal traces and linearily combining them, these artifacts are reduced in the reconstructed image.

Subsequent reconstruction of the modified raw data yields an artifacts-reduced image without metallic objects. A final combination procedure reinserts these missing objects into the artifacts-reduced image to get the final corrected image.

Second Correction Step

One drawback of every interpolation scheme is the introduction of secondary artifacts. Although the proposed algorithm already showed an improved reduction of the most severe artifacts, secondary artifacts connecting the implants and structures of high attenuation still appeared.^20–23 We, therefore, combined, in a second step, an attenuation-normalization method as proposed by Müller and Buzug²¹ and extended by Meyer et al²² with the first interpolation correction. This correction procedure uses a multilevel segmentation, which distinguishes not only air and soft tissue but also soft tissue and bone. The different tissue classes are represented by different values in the segmented image (air = 0, soft tissue = 1, bone = 2). This image is forward-projected to normalize the attenuation values in the raw data and to preserve edge information lost after interpolation. Subsequently, 3D LI is performed to get the final corrected image, followed by a denormalization of the interpolated raw data. The reconstruction of a first 3D LI corrected image is necessary to minimize the influence of metal artifacts on the segmented image because they can easily be detected as bony structures.

Evaluation of CT Values, Image Noise, and Spatial Resolution

For investigation of CT-value consistency and image noise before and after correction, a subvolume of the original scan was used. After reconstruction of the coarse image, a dedicated bone-removal algorithm removed bone and implant and air structures so that an investigation of soft tissue, which also contains the obscuring artifacts, was enabled. A simple threshold-based segmentation would falsely detect artifacts as bony structures or air inclusions. Figure 3A shows the image containing only the soft-tissue-equivalent areas, which are used for evaluation. The difference in the maximal CT value in the soft-tissue region and the difference in image noise σ before and after correction were calculated according to

Fig 3.

Investigated soft-tissue image (A) and graphs of the results for the differences in CT values (B) and image noise (C).

Standardized spatial resolution investigations (eg, bar pattern and modulation transfer functions) cannot be performed in clinical datasets. Therefore, only a visual investigation of spatial resolution was performed. We, therefore, calculated difference images between the uncorrected and corrected image by using a sharp reconstruction kernel. General changes in spatial resolution would be indicated by visible object edges or other structural information besides the artifact structures. The aim of the MAR method was to reduce the metal-induced artifacts while not decreasing spatial resolution.

Patient Cases

A total of 7 consecutive rotational patient head scans were evaluated, in which 5 patients were treated with detachable platinum coil embolization; 1 patient, with detachable platinum coil embolization and additional clipping; and 1 patient only, with several intracranial clips. One patient showed subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 1 patient, intracerebral hemorrhage. The FDCT scan was performed at the end of the coiling procedure to rule out rebleeding and acute hydrocephalus and to confirm the correct positioning of an external ventricular drainage. We chose patients with a >25-cm coil length implanted, because beam-hardening artifacts would be most prominent in these patients. For the patients with clipping, the FDCT scanning was performed at the end of the control angiography after surgery to rule out hydrocephalus and to confirm the correct positioning of an external drainage.

All scans were carried out without additional contrast agent injection (uncollimated, full-field head scans). No special requirements were needed for this study because the raw data were processed only retrospectively. The images (uncorrected and corrected) were stored anonymized on a workstation for evaluation by 2 experienced neuroradiologists.

Results

Evaluation of CT Values, Image Noise, and Spatial Resolution

Results for the assessment of maximal CT value are shown in Fig 3B, where the differences between the maximal achieved CT values in soft-tissue areas are listed. After we applied the correction algorithm, the maximal CT value, artificially changed by beam-hardening and metal-induced noise artifacts, was reduced by up to 1600 HU. Maximal CT values in the detected soft-tissue areas were reduced to a mean maximal value of 40 HU after correction. On average, a reduction of 1300 HU was achieved. MAR also yielded a more homogeneous CT-value distribution in soft-tissue and bony regions.

Image-noise evaluation (Fig 3C) shows a drastic reduction of metal-induced noise after correction. For all patients, image noise was reduced by typically 27%, corresponding to a mean reduction of 17 HU. The correction achieved a lower image noise in every studied case, which also led to better low-contrast detectability²⁴ in these areas. The decrease of image noise in soft-tissue regions can be regarded as an indicator for an increase of homogeneity as shown by Fahrig et al²⁴ and Prell et al.²⁵

To evaluate the influence of the correction method on the spatial resolution of the corrected CT images, we used difference images to show explicitly which image areas were affected by our MAR method. Figure 4A shows the uncorrected, the corrected, and the corresponding difference image (reconstructed by using a sharp reconstruction kernel to get a more precise indicator for spatial resolution changes) for patients 1, 6, and 7. As can clearly be seen in Fig 4C, -F, only metal-induced noise, beam-hardening, and scatter artifacts are corrected; no structural information other than the streak and noise artifacts is visible in the difference image. The correction process only changed image details related to metal artifacts. However, even in a narrow windowing, this additional information is not present, which confirms that the correction process preserves the spatial resolution provided by FDCT imaging.

Fig 4.

A, D, and G, Uncorrected images. B, E, and H, MAR-corrected images (windows setting of C0/W1000). C, F, and I, Corresponding difference images (narrower windows setting of C0/W500). The difference images apparently contain no other structural information than the metal-induced artifacts.

Implant Visibility, Brain-Tissue Imaging, and Overall Image Quality

Figure 5 shows the uncorrected and corrected images for 3 patients in the sagittal view and in the sections corresponding to the dashed line in the subfigures of Fig 5A, -D, and -G. Beam-hardening artifacts and photon starvation caused a drastic reduction of the CT values between the connecting lines of the coil and clips and reduced the CT values in these areas below the representable value of −1024 HU. No information could be obtained. After correction, the brain tissue surrounding the implants is displayed without disturbing metal artifacts. Also, the implants themselves are displayed more clearly than before correction. Correction now provides information even for areas that were severely contaminated with artifacts as depicted by arrow 1 in Fig 5C. The clips and detachable coils used for embolization are displayed without beam-hardening or noise artifacts after correction. Also, fine bone structures previously superimposed by metal-induced artifacts become visible. Arrow 2 in Fig 5E, -F shows bony structures after correction, which could have been mistakenly detected as metal artifacts in the original image. Imaging of the close vicinity (down to 0.58 mm from the implants) of the clips and coils is also improved; this change allows a proper diagnosis even of these areas.

Fig 5.

A, D, and G, Sagittal views of patients 2–4. B, E, and H, Uncorrected CT section corresponding to the dashed line. C, F, and I, Corrected CT section. Arrow 1 shows the restored CT values and information between the clips and coils after correction. Arrow 2 indicates the bony structures visible after correction even close to the detechable coil (C0/W1000).

This improvement becomes even more obvious by looking at Fig 6. Shown here is patient 5, treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). The first FDCT, acquired before the intervention, demonstrates the hemorrhage caused by the aneurysm. Notice the configuration of the hemorrhage. The coiling procedure was uneventful. After successful endovascular therapy, the uncorrected images (Fig 6D−F) show massive artifacts caused by the coil package. In the axial images (Fig 6E, magnification in Fig 6F), the surroundings of the aneurysm are completely masked by artifacts. After MAR (Figs 6G−I), the artifacts are eliminated and the configuration of the hemorrhage can be recognized as it was before the coiling procedure. The coil package can be recognized as a bright oval structure. The disturbing artifacts are reduced to a large degree so that proper analysis of the implant, the surrounding tissue, and the bleeding itself is enabled. One drawback seems to be the imaging of the transition area between the implant and surrounding tissue. Although drastic improvement in imaging of these areas was achieved, due to the interpolation scheme in the raw data, these areas contain miscalculated CT values.

Fig 6.

Scans of patient 5. A−C, Before coiling, sagittal image (A), transversal image (B), and the corresponding magnified ROI (C). D−F, After coiling, sagittal image (D), uncorrected transversal image (E); and the corresponding magnified ROI (F). G−I, Sagittal corrected image (G), corrected transversal image (H), and the corresponding magnified ROI (I). After MAR is applied, one can recognize the size and configuration of the bleeding in the same way as before the coiling procedure (C0/W250).

Discussion

FDCT is increasingly used after embolization of intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, or intracranial stent placement to recognize potential hemorrhagic complications as soon as possible. In the presence of metallic implants, artifacts caused by the metal often obscure image details and may prevent a proper diagnosis of areas of interest. It is, therefore, of great importance to reduce these deteriorating artifacts to a minimum for better diagnosis. In this study, a new MAR approach was tested and evaluated. The MAR algorithm especially designed for FDCT systems and geometries provided better image quality with respect to the visualization of brain tissue surrounding the implants in every studied case.

Metal artifacts, mainly due to beam-hardening, scattered radiation, sampling, and noise artifacts were largely reduced after correction. This reduction not only achieved an overall improved image quality without the disturbing artifacts but also allowed a diagnosis of areas previously obscured by these artifacts. Especially during embolization by using detachable platinum coils, our algorithm proved to be a promising addition to standard FDCT imaging because better imaging of the implant and areas close to the implants was achieved. This becomes even more important when routine follow-up scanning has to be performed to investigate the position of the implant or to rule out rebleedings after embolization. Our approach improved the visibility of intracerebral hemorrhage close to metallic objects and may allow a more precise recognition of rebleeding during interventions because rebleeding may be masked by metal artifacts. One can assume that MAR may be useful in the visualization of other implants that need a high spatial resolution, like cochlear implants, stapes prostheses, or ventricular drainages.

One limitation is related to the imaging of the transition area to the metal implant. Although artifacts were largely reduced, resolution losses close to the implant can occur if the attenuation values in the raw data are not replaced by proper surrogate data; thus, reliable CT values of the transition area between implant and surrounding tissue can only be given with reserve. Incorrect CT values could lead to misinterpretations in these areas. However, this area of noticeable influence is here restricted to 0.6 mm from the implant. Before correction, the transition zone was not evaluable due to the massive metal artifacts. Nevertheless, by comparing the drawbacks and assets of our correction algorithm, one can see that an overall improvement of implant visibility and image quality was achieved. Another drawback may be that every raw data–based correction scheme entails a modification of raw data, and secondary artifacts introduced by the correction scheme cannot be excluded. The clinical evaluation of the images, therefore, has to include the uncorrected and the corrected version of the images. Although progress in terms of suppressing these secondary artifacts was made, negative effects still have to be monitored.

Interpolation-based MAR in FDCT shows promising results in these cases, which appear to be better than results shown in other publications regarding conventional CT.^16,20,21,23 One reason for this is the smaller sampling distance (ie, spatial resolution provided by the FD). While conventional CT provides detector-element sizes of approximately 0.6 mm, FDs achieve sizes down to 154 μm. This allows a much closer interpolation to the implants in the raw data. Another advantage of the method shown here seems to be the correction in the raw data itself (ie, on every perturbed detector pixel), whereas most published corrections in conventional CT were performed in the subsequent calculated sinogram after acquisition.^16,18,21,23 Furthermore, our algorithm uses not only the attenuation values in each projection for calculating surrogate attenuation values but also the attenuation values from different projection angles, making the interpolation scheme truly 3D.

The algorithm itself can be easily included in a daily routine because no special requirements are needed for the FDCT system, and the correction and segmentation processes work automatically. Computational times compared with those in standard reconstruction can also be largely reduced by combining MAR with acceleration techniques on graphic processing units,^26,27 which gives the radiologist the uncorrected and corrected image within almost the same time.

Conclusions

The MAR algorithm presented here provides an improved visibility in the close vicinity of the intracranial clips and endoaneurysmal coil packages in this limited sample of patient datasets. The obscuring metal artifacts were largely reduced, and an increase in homogeneity in soft-tissue regions was achieved. A better detectability of hemorrhage during or after endovascular embolization may be achieved. A large-scale clinical study is still pending.

Footnotes

This work was supported by orthoMIT-Minimal Invasive Orthopedic Therapy, grant 01EQ0426, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Berlin, Germany.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
1. Dörfler A,
2. Struffert T,
3. Engelhorn T,
4. et al
. Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo 2008; 180: 891–98
PubMed
2.↵
1. Södermann M,
2. Babic D,
3. Holmin S,
4. et al
. Brain imaging with a detector C-arm: technique and clinical interest of XperCT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 863–68
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
1. Kalender WA,
2. Kyriakou Y
. Flat-detector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2767–79
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
1. Doelken M,
2. Struffert T,
3. Richter G,
4. et al
. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 517–23. Epub 2008 Mar 11
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
1. Richter G,
2. Engelhorn T,
3. Struffert T,
4. et al
. Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1902–08
Abstract/FREE Full Text
6.↵
1. Kyriakou Y,
2. Richter G,
3. Dörfler A,
4. et al
. Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 29: 1930–36
CrossRef
7.↵
1. Struffert T,
2. Richter G,
3. Engelhorn T,
4. et al
. Visualization of intracerebral hemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 619–25
PubMed
8.↵
1. Engelhorn T,
2. Struffert T,
3. Richter G,
4. et al
. Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1581–84
Abstract/FREE Full Text
9.↵
1. Struffert T,
2. Buhk JH,
3. Buchfelder M,
4. et al
. Coil migration after endovascular coil occlusion of internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms within the sphenoid sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52: 89–92. Epub 2009 May 18
CrossRef PubMed
10.↵
1. Molyneux AJ,
2. Kerr RS,
3. Yu LM
. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809–17
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
1. Wanke I,
2. Gizewski E,
3. Dörfler A,
4. et al
. Stenting plus coiling: dangerous or helpful [in German]? Rofo 2005; 177: 1255–59
PubMed
12.↵
1. Wanke I,
2. Dörfler A,
3. Göricke S,
4. et al
. Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent: mid-term results. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005; 66: 163–69
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
1. Wanke I,
2. Egelhof T,
3. Dörfler A,
4. et al
. Intracranial aneurysms: pathogenesis, rupture risk, treatment options [in German]. Rofo 2003; 175: 1064–1070
PubMed
14.↵
1. Carvi Y,
2. Nievas M,
3. Haas E,
4. et al
. Severe intracranial bleedings during endovascular procedures: outcome of surgically treated patients. Neurol Res 2007; 29: 81–90
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
1. Yazdia M,
2. Gingras L,
3. Beaulieu L
. An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 1224–31
CrossRef PubMed
16.↵
1. Bal M,
2. Spies L
. Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Med Phys 2005; 33: 2852–59
CrossRef
17.↵
1. Oehler M,
2. Buzug TM
. Statistical image reconstruction for inconsistent CT projection data. Methods Inf Med 2005; 46: 261–69
18.↵
1. Kalender WA,
2. Hebel R,
3. Ebersberger J
. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987; 164: 576–77
PubMed
19.↵
1. Feldkamp LA,
2. Davis LC,
3. Kress JW
. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1984; A1: 612–19
CrossRef
20.↵
1. Prell D,
2. Kyriakou Y,
3. Kalender WA
. A dedicated raw data-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector CT. European Radiology 19, Suppl. 1: 257 B-514, March 2009, Vienna, Austria
21.↵
1. Müller J,
2. Buzug TM
. Spurious structures created by interpolation-based CT metal artifact reduction. Med Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, vol. 7258, 13; March 2009; Lake Buena Vista, Florida
22.↵
1. Meyer E,
2. Berger F,
3. Raupach R,
4. et al
. Normalized Metal Artifact Reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. In: IEEE Medical Imaging Conference Record. 2009. Proceedings M09-206, October 2009, Orlando, Florida
23.↵
1. Mahnken AH,
2. Raupach R,
3. Wildberger JE,
4. et al
. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 769–75
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
1. Fahrig R,
2. Dixon R,
3. Payne T,
4. et al
. Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 2006; 33: 4541–50
CrossRef PubMed
25.↵
1. Prell D,
2. Kyriakou Y,
3. Kalender WA
. Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 3881–95
CrossRef PubMed
26.↵
1. Schiwietz T,
2. Bose S,
3. Maltz J,
4. et al
. A fast and high-quality cone beam reconstruction pipeline using the GPU. Med Imaging 2007; Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, vol. 6516, 16; March 2007; Lake Buena Vista, Florida
27.↵
1. Kyriakou Y,
2. Lapp RM,
3. Hillebrand L,
4. et al
. Simultaneous misalignment correction for approximate circular cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 267–89

Received June 19, 2009.
Accepted after revision August 7, 2009.

View Abstract

[1] 1.↵
Dörfler A,
Struffert T,
Engelhorn T,
et al
. Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo 2008; 180: 891–98
PubMed

[2] Dörfler A,

[3] Struffert T,

[4] Engelhorn T,

[5] et al

[6] 2.↵
Södermann M,
Babic D,
Holmin S,
et al
. Brain imaging with a detector C-arm: technique and clinical interest of XperCT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 863–68
CrossRef PubMed

[7] Södermann M,

[8] Babic D,

[9] Holmin S,

[10] et al

[11] 3.↵
Kalender WA,
Kyriakou Y
. Flat-detector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2767–79
CrossRef PubMed

[12] Kalender WA,

[13] Kyriakou Y

[14] 4.↵
Doelken M,
Struffert T,
Richter G,
et al
. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 517–23. Epub 2008 Mar 11
CrossRef PubMed

[15] Doelken M,

[16] Struffert T,

[17] Richter G,

[18] et al

[19] 5.↵
Richter G,
Engelhorn T,
Struffert T,
et al
. Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1902–08
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] Richter G,

[21] Engelhorn T,

[22] Struffert T,

[23] et al

[24] 6.↵
Kyriakou Y,
Richter G,
Dörfler A,
et al
. Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 29: 1930–36
CrossRef

[25] Kyriakou Y,

[26] Richter G,

[27] Dörfler A,

[28] et al

[29] 7.↵
Struffert T,
Richter G,
Engelhorn T,
et al
. Visualization of intracerebral hemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 619–25
PubMed

[30] Struffert T,

[31] Richter G,

[32] Engelhorn T,

[33] et al

[34] 8.↵
Engelhorn T,
Struffert T,
Richter G,
et al
. Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1581–84
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[35] Engelhorn T,

[36] Struffert T,

[37] Richter G,

[38] et al

[39] 9.↵
Struffert T,
Buhk JH,
Buchfelder M,
et al
. Coil migration after endovascular coil occlusion of internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms within the sphenoid sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52: 89–92. Epub 2009 May 18
CrossRef PubMed

[40] Struffert T,

[41] Buhk JH,

[42] Buchfelder M,

[43] et al

[44] 10.↵
Molyneux AJ,
Kerr RS,
Yu LM
. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809–17
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Molyneux AJ,

[46] Kerr RS,

[47] Yu LM

[48] 11.↵
Wanke I,
Gizewski E,
Dörfler A,
et al
. Stenting plus coiling: dangerous or helpful [in German]? Rofo 2005; 177: 1255–59
PubMed

[49] Wanke I,

[50] Gizewski E,

[51] Dörfler A,

[52] et al

[53] 12.↵
Wanke I,
Dörfler A,
Göricke S,
et al
. Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent: mid-term results. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005; 66: 163–69
CrossRef PubMed

[54] Wanke I,

[55] Dörfler A,

[56] Göricke S,

[57] et al

[58] 13.↵
Wanke I,
Egelhof T,
Dörfler A,
et al
. Intracranial aneurysms: pathogenesis, rupture risk, treatment options [in German]. Rofo 2003; 175: 1064–1070
PubMed

[59] Wanke I,

[60] Egelhof T,

[61] Dörfler A,

[62] et al

[63] 14.↵
Carvi Y,
Nievas M,
Haas E,
et al
. Severe intracranial bleedings during endovascular procedures: outcome of surgically treated patients. Neurol Res 2007; 29: 81–90
CrossRef PubMed

[64] Carvi Y,

[65] Nievas M,

[66] Haas E,

[67] et al

[68] 15.↵
Yazdia M,
Gingras L,
Beaulieu L
. An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 1224–31
CrossRef PubMed

[69] Yazdia M,

[70] Gingras L,

[71] Beaulieu L

[72] 16.↵
Bal M,
Spies L
. Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Med Phys 2005; 33: 2852–59
CrossRef

[73] Bal M,

[74] Spies L

[75] 17.↵
Oehler M,
Buzug TM
. Statistical image reconstruction for inconsistent CT projection data. Methods Inf Med 2005; 46: 261–69

[76] Oehler M,

[77] Buzug TM

[78] 18.↵
Kalender WA,
Hebel R,
Ebersberger J
. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987; 164: 576–77
PubMed

[79] Kalender WA,

[80] Hebel R,

[81] Ebersberger J

[82] 19.↵
Feldkamp LA,
Davis LC,
Kress JW
. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1984; A1: 612–19
CrossRef

[83] Feldkamp LA,

[84] Davis LC,

[85] Kress JW

[86] 20.↵
Prell D,
Kyriakou Y,
Kalender WA
. A dedicated raw data-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector CT. European Radiology 19, Suppl. 1: 257 B-514, March 2009, Vienna, Austria

[87] Prell D,

[88] Kyriakou Y,

[89] Kalender WA

[90] 21.↵
Müller J,
Buzug TM
. Spurious structures created by interpolation-based CT metal artifact reduction. Med Imaging 2009: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, vol. 7258, 13; March 2009; Lake Buena Vista, Florida

[91] Müller J,

[92] Buzug TM

[93] 22.↵
Meyer E,
Berger F,
Raupach R,
et al
. Normalized Metal Artifact Reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. In: IEEE Medical Imaging Conference Record. 2009. Proceedings M09-206, October 2009, Orlando, Florida

[94] Meyer E,

[95] Berger F,

[96] Raupach R,

[97] et al

[98] 23.↵
Mahnken AH,
Raupach R,
Wildberger JE,
et al
. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 769–75
CrossRef PubMed

[99] Mahnken AH,

[100] Raupach R,

[101] Wildberger JE,

[102] et al

[103] 24.↵
Fahrig R,
Dixon R,
Payne T,
et al
. Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 2006; 33: 4541–50
CrossRef PubMed

[104] Fahrig R,

[105] Dixon R,

[106] Payne T,

[107] et al

[108] 25.↵
Prell D,
Kyriakou Y,
Kalender WA
. Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 3881–95
CrossRef PubMed

[109] Prell D,

[110] Kyriakou Y,

[111] Kalender WA

[112] 26.↵
Schiwietz T,
Bose S,
Maltz J,
et al
. A fast and high-quality cone beam reconstruction pipeline using the GPU. Med Imaging 2007; Physics of Medical Imaging, Proc. SPIE, vol. 6516, 16; March 2007; Lake Buena Vista, Florida

[113] Schiwietz T,

[114] Bose S,

[115] Maltz J,

[116] et al

[117] 27.↵
Kyriakou Y,
Lapp RM,
Hillebrand L,
et al
. Simultaneous misalignment correction for approximate circular cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 267–89

[118] Kyriakou Y,

[119] Lapp RM,

[120] Hillebrand L,

[121] et al

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Metal Artifact Reduction for Clipping and Coiling in Interventional C-Arm CT

Abstract

Abbreviations