Noninvasive Assessment of IDH Mutational Status in World Health Organization Grade II and III Astrocytomas Using DWI and DSC-PWI Combined with Conventional MR Imaging

Z. Xing; X. Yang; D. She; Y. Lin; Y. Zhang; D. Cao

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5171

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) has been shown to have both diagnostic and prognostic implications in gliomas. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DWI and DSC-PWI combined with conventional MR imaging could noninvasively predict IDH mutational status in World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging in 42 patients with World Health Organization grade II and III astrocytomas. Minimum ADC, relative ADC, and relative maximum CBV values were compared between IDH-mutant and wild-type tumors by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression were used to assess their diagnostic performances.

RESULTS: Minimum ADC and relative ADC were significantly higher in IDH-mutated grade II and III astrocytomas than in IDH wild-type tumors (P < .05). Minimum ADC with the cutoff value of ≥1.01 × 10⁻³ mm²/s could differentiate the mutational status with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 76.9%, 82.6%, 91.2%, and 60.5%, respectively. The threshold value of <2.35 for relative maximum CBV in the prediction of IDH mutation provided a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100.0%, 60.9%, 85.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. A combination of DWI, DSC-PWI, and conventional MR imaging for the identification of IDH mutations resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 92.3%, 91.3%, 96.1%, and 83.6%.

CONCLUSIONS: A combination of conventional MR imaging, DWI, and DSC-PWI techniques produces a high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting IDH mutations in grade II and III astrocytomas. The strategy of using advanced, semiquantitative MR imaging techniques may provide an important, noninvasive, surrogate marker that should be studied further in larger, prospective trials.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ADC_min: minimum ADC
cMRI: conventional MR imaging
IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase
rADC: relative ADC
rCBV: relative CBV
rCBV_max: relative maximum CBV
WHO: World Health Organization

Infiltrating astrocytomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors, ranging variably from grade II to IV according to the 2007 World Health Organization classification system.^1,2 Glioma grading is based on histopathologic analysis of tumor differentiation, mitotic activity, cellularity, nuclear atypia, and the extent of microvascular proliferation and may result in a great deal of interobserver variability.^1⇓–3 Therefore, quantitative molecular analyses have the potential to reduce subjectivity and improve diagnosis, prognostication, risk stratification, and management plans. Notably, in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, grade II and III astrocytomas are molecularly divided into isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant, IDH wild type, and not otherwise specified categories, emphasizing the value of IDH mutation status in astrocytomas.⁴

IDH gene mutations, originally discovered in high-grade gliomas in 2008, exist in 60%–90% of grade II and III astrocytomas.^5,6 The IDH gene (including IDH1 and IDH2 genes) plays prominent roles in the metabolism, pathogenesis, and progression of astrocytomas.^7⇓–9 In addition, stratification of grade II and III gliomas into subsets defined by IDH mutation would help identify subgroups with distinct prognostic characteristics, therapeutic response, and clinical management.^{10⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–16} In a study with a cohort of 475 patients, comparison of overall survival between those with WHO grade II and III IDH-mutated astrocytomas showed no remarkable difference, whereas the patients with IDH-mutated tumors survived much longer than those with IDH wild-type tumors.¹⁰ Patients with grade II astrocytomas without IDH mutation were shown to have a poorer prognosis with a 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rate of 14% and 51%, respectively, compared with 42% and 93% for those with IDH-mutant tumors (P < .001).¹⁷ Moreover, patients with gliomas whose lesions had IDH mutations were more sensitive to chemoradiation therapy and survived longer than those with wild-type IDH.^10,15

Currently, immunohistochemical staining and DNA sequencing are the most common methods for determining the IDH mutational status in gliomas. IDH gene mutations may reflect alterations in metabolism, cellularity, and angiogenesis, which may manifest characteristic features on DWI and DSC-PWI.^8,18 DWI can noninvasively provide direct insight into the microscopic physical properties of tissues through observing the Brownian movement of water and reflecting cellularity within the lesions by ADC values.^19⇓–21 In vivo measurement of relative CBV (rCBV) has been demonstrated to correlate with tumor vascularity.^22⇓–24 ADC values derived from DWI and DSC-PWI have been used to detect IDH gene status in gliomas in recent research.^24⇓–26 Meanwhile, conventional MR imaging (cMRI) was also used to assess other characteristics of gliomas (eg, location, distinctness of borders, enhancement, and edema).^17,27,28

To our knowledge, there is no study in the literature combining cMRI with diffusion and perfusion techniques to distinguish IDH genotypes. The purpose of this study was to explore whether a novel approach, in which DWI and DSC-PWI were combined with cMRI, was able to noninvasively predict IDH mutational status in WHO grade II and III astrocytomas.

Materials and Methods

Patients

The ethics committee of our hospital approved this retrospective study, and the requirement for patient informed consent was waived due to the nature of the retrospective study. Ninety-six patients who underwent surgical resection or stereotactic biopsy at our institution from July 2014 through June 2016 were selected. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) definite histopathologic diagnosis of grade II and III astrocytomas based on the WHO 2016 classification criteria, 2) cMRI, DWI, and DSC-PWI performed before treatment, and 3) all data available in 3T MR imaging. As a result, 42 patients (26 males and 16 females; mean age, 41.83 ± 15.98 years; age range, 8–72 years) were included in the study.

MR Imaging Techniques

Images were acquired in the routine clinical work-up on a 3T MR imaging system (Magnetom Verio Tim; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with an 8-channel head matrix coil. The conventional MR imaging protocols consisted of the following sequences: axial T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging (TR = 250 ms; TE = 2.48 ms), axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging (TR = 4000 ms; TE = 96 ms), axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging (TR/TE = 9000/94 ms; TI= 2500 ms), and 3 orthogonal plane contrast-enhanced gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging scans (TR/TE, 250/2.48 ms) acquired following the acquisition of DSC-PWI sequences. The section thickness (5 mm), intersection gap (1 mm), and FOV (220 × 220 mm) were uniform in all sequences.

DWI was performed in the axial plane with a spin-echo echo-planar sequence before injection of contrast material. The imaging parameters used were as follows: TR/TE = 8200/102 ms, NEX = 2.0, section thickness = 5 mm, intersection gap = 1 mm, FOV = 220 × 220 mm. The b-values were 0 and 1000 s/mm² with diffusion gradients encoded in the 3 orthogonal directions to generate 3 sets of diffusion-weighted images. Processing of the ADC map was generated automatically by the MR imaging system.

DSC-PWI was performed with a gradient-recalled T2*-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence. The imaging parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 1000–1250/54 ms, flip angle = 35°, section thickness = 5 mm, intersection gap = 1 mm, NEX = 1.0, FOV = 220 × 220 mm. During the first 3 phases, images were acquired before injecting the contrast material to establish a precontrast baseline. When the scan was to the fourth phase of DSC-PWI, a bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight and 5 mL/s was injected intravenously with an MR imaging–compatible power injector. After we injected a bolus of the contrast material, a 20.0-mL bolus of saline was administered at the same injection rate. The series of 20 sections, 60 phases, and 1200 images was obtained in 1 minute 36 seconds.

Data Processing

Image postprocessing of perfusion data and perfusion measurements was performed on an off-line syngo B19 workstation (Siemens) with standard software. All cMRI data with respect to tumor locations, heterogeneity, borders, peritumoral edema, and contrast-enhancement pattern were assessed by 2 neuroradiologists who were blinded to tumor histology and molecular characteristics. Tumor location, considered to be the lobe within which the bulk of the tumor resided, was divided into 6 groups: frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, insular lobe, occipital lobe, and others (basal ganglia, thalamus, brain stem, and cerebellum). Edema was defined as a nonenhanced area on contrast-enhanced T1WI and higher signal outside the tumoral solid area on T2WI and FLAIR. Tumor borders were classified as sharp or indistinct on the basis of T2WI and FLAIR sequences (relatively decreased signal intensity on T2WI or FLAIR should be regarded as tumor area rather than edema in gliomas). A senior neuroradiologist made the final decision when 2 observers disagreed.

For evaluation of DWI data, ADC values were measured by manually selecting ROIs inside the tumor regions on the ADC maps. All continuous sections including tumors were observed. At least 5 small round ROIs (30–40 mm²) were placed inside the tumors on the ADC maps without overlap. The bigger the tumor was, the more ROIs were selected. Finally, the ROI with the lowest ADC value was chosen to calculate minimum ADC (ADC_min). We made the ROI placement from the solid portion of the lesion (defined on T2WI and contrast-enhanced T1WI), avoiding hemorrhagic, cystic, necrotic, or apparent blood vessel regions that might influence the ADC values. The minimum ADC is calculated as the mean value of the ROI of the lowest ADC value. The same method was applied to a corresponding area in the contralateral normal-appearing white matter judged on both T2WI and contrast-enhanced T1WI. Relative ADC (rADC) of the tumors was determined as the ratio of the minimum ADC divided by the mean ADC of the contralateral unaffected white matter. ADC_min values were expressed as × 10⁻³ square millimeters per second.

For assessment of DSC-PWI data, whole-brain CBV maps were generated by applying a single-compartment model and an automated arterial input function. The relative maximum CBV (rCBV_max) was calculated by dividing the tumor CBV voxel value by the mean CBV value of the contralateral unaffected white matter to minimize variances in rCBV_max values in each individual patient. Measurements of rCBV_max values were performed with the same ROIs as those used for ADC measurements. The ROIs for the ADC and rCBV measurements were not identical and were not from the same region of the tumor in each patient. The signal intensities on DWI, rADC, ADC_min, and rCBV_max parameters were determined by another senior neuroradiologist who was experienced in diffusion and perfusion data acquisition and blinded to the tumor histology and molecular data. This method has been shown to provide the highest interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility.²⁹

Immunohistochemistry Staining

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5-μm-thick sections from paraffin-embedded tumor specimens of all evaluated patients. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the monoclonal anti-mIDH1 antibody (DIA-H09; Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) that specifically reacts with the mutant IDH1-R132, the most common glioma-derived mutation,³⁰ but not with the wild-type IDH1. Following incubation with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody, the slides were then stained with the Cytomation EnVision + System horseradish peroxidase (diaminobenzidine) detection kit (Dako, Carpenteria, California) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Staining was interpreted as positive when ≥10% of tumor cells showed a strong cytoplasmic staining for mIDH1, whereas staining of <10% of tumor cells was counted as negative findings.³¹

DNA Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections by using MyghtyAmp for FFPE (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mutational alterations of IDH1 and IDH2 at hotspot codons R132 and R172 were assessed by a bidirectional cycle sequencing of polymerase chain reaction–amplified fragments with the following primers: IDH1f (5′-TGCCACCAACGACCAAGTCA-3′) and IDH1r (5′-CATGCAAAA TCACATATTTGCC-3′); IDH2f (5′-TGAAAGATGGCGGCTGCAGT-3′) and IDH2r (5′-GGGGTGAAGACCATTTTGAA-3′).

Data Analysis

All quantitative parameters are presented as mean ± SD. Comparisons of ADC_min, rADC, and rCBV_max values between IDH-mutant and wild type of grade II and III astrocytomas were made with the Mann-Whitney U test. The receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the best cutoff value in discriminating IDH-mutant from wild-type tumors. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden index, and area under the curve based on optimum thresholds for variable parameters were calculated. We chose the cutoff value for each quantitative parameter that provided optimal sensitivity and specificity. In addition, comparisons of the areas under the curve for different variables were made with the Z-test. Statistical analysis was calculated in SPSS, Version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Forty-two histologically confirmed grade II and III astrocytoma cases including 17 cases with IDH mutation and 25 cases without such mutation were enrolled in this study. The clinical, histologic, and cMRI characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Twenty-five patients with no IDH1 or IDH2 mutations were older (IDH mutation = 35.76 ± 9.13 years, IDH wild type = 45.96 ± 18.36 years, P = .041) and demonstrated more indistinct margins than those with IDH mutations (IDH mutation, 6/17; IDH wild type, 17/25; P = .037). Tumors with IDH mutations were more likely to occur in the frontal lobes (Figs 1A, -B, and 2A, -B). No differences in heterogeneous appearance were observed among the groups.

View this table:

Table 1:

The main clinical and cMRI features of IDH mutational status in grade II and III astrocytomas^{^a}

Fig 1.

A 52-year-old woman with a diffuse astrocytoma without IDH mutation. A, Axial T2WI demonstrates heterogeneous high signal intensity with indistinct borders on the left temporal lobe. B, Contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted image demonstrates a lesion enhancement with blurred borders. C, A corresponding ADC map shows the tumor with a decreased ADC value (ADC_min = 0.684 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, rADC = 1.08). D, Correlative color CBV image shows elevated perfusion with the calculated rCBV_max of 3.10.

Fig 2.

A 50-year-old man with an anaplastic astrocytoma with an IDH mutation. A, Axial T2WI demonstrates heterogeneous high signal intensity with sharp borders on the right temporal lobe. B, Contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted image demonstrates a nonenhancing lesion in the right temporal region. C, A corresponding ADC map shows the tumor with an increased ADC value (ADC_min = 1.456 × 10⁻³mm²/s, rADC = 2.51). D, Correlative color CBV image shows relatively low perfusion with the calculated rCBV_max of 1.86.

The ADC_min values, rADC ratios, and rCBV_max calculated for IDH-mutant and wild-type grade II and III astrocytomas are summarized in Table 2. Both the ADC_min (IDH mutation = 1.21 ± 0.27, IDH wild type = 0.87 ± 0.18; P < .001) and rADC (IDH mutation = 1.88 ± 0.41; IDH wild type = 1.37 ± 0.31; P < .001) were significantly higher in IDH-mutant tumors than in wild types (Figs 1C and 2C). The rCBV_max (IDH mutation = 1.41 ± 0.50; IDH wild type = 3.47 ± 2.34; P = .004) in patients with IDH-mutant tumors was significantly lower than in those with IDH wild-type tumors (Table 2 and Figs 1D and 2D).

View this table:

Table 2:

Comparison of DWI and DSC-PWI variables between IDH mutation and wild-type grade II and III astrocytomas

The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis are shown in Table 3 and Fig 3. Logistic regression analysis was used to test these cMRI parameters among groups; then, a combination of cMRI, DWI, and DSC-PWI for the diagnosis of IDH mutation yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden index of 92.31%, 91.30%, 96.10%, 83.60%, and 0.84, respectively. A significant difference was found in the areas under the curve between cMRI and cMRI + DWI + DSC-PWI (Z = 2.8, P = .005).

View this table:

Table 3:

Measurement of TV, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, YI, and AUC of ADC_min values, rADC, rCBV_max, cMRI, DWI + DSC-PWI, and cMRI+ DWI + DSC-PWI for assessing the IDH status of grade II and III astrocytomas

Fig 3.

Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves of ADC_min, rADC, rCBV_max (A) and cMRI, DWI + DSC-PWI, and cMRI + DWI + DSC-PWI (B) in differentiating IDH-mutant grade II and III astrocytomas from wild types.

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that cMRI, DWI, and DSC-PWI can be used to evaluate the IDH mutational status in gliomas and that a combination of DWI, DSC-PWI, and cMRI further improves the diagnostic accuracy. We found that patients with IDH wild-type tumors were significantly older than those with IDH-mutated tumors. This correlation between age and IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas has also been reported by Metellus et al.¹⁷ Our finding that IDH-mutated tumors tend to reside in the frontal lobes is consistent with previous studies reporting that IDH-mutation tumors are strongly associated with frontal locations.^9,28 In this study, all 11 tumors that did not involve the cerebral cortex were IDH wild type, which confirmed a previous finding in anaplastic gliomas that tumors not located in the cerebral cortex were IDH-intact tumors.²⁷ While the radiologic appearance of infiltrating lesions in anaplastic gliomas was associated with IDH mutation status,¹⁷ these cMRI characteristics lack the ability to quantify the findings. Indeed, it is challenging to determine molecular alterations of such tumors by using cMRI only.

ADC_min values have been extensively used to investigate brain tumors and their prognosis.^{21,32⇓–34} Tan et al²⁵ reported that ADC_min and rADC could be used to identify gliomas with and without IDH mutation. Similarly, Lee et al³⁵ found that the mean ADC value was a useful parameter for differentiating IDH1 gene mutation–positive high-grade gliomas from the mutation-negative subtypes with histogram analysis. Our study demonstrated that the ADC_min and rADC values of IDH-mutant grade II and III astrocytomas were higher than those of wild types. ADC_min has been shown to depict the sites of highest cellularity within heterogeneous tumors.^21,33 Therefore, we chose this simple-but-efficient method for the tumor analysis and differentiation. Accumulating evidence has indicated that mutation in the IDH gene family could reduce catalytic generation of α-ketoglutarate and, in turn, lead to the production of the oncometabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate [(R)-2HG], ultimately giving rise to increased cell proliferation or cellularity.^36⇓–38 Therefore, it is conceivable that differences in ADC_min and rADC values as presented in the current study might be useful for predicting the molecular profile in astrocytomas with respect to IDH mutational status.

DSC-PWI has the potential to noninvasively provide morphologic and functional information about gliomas.^22,23 Law et al³⁹ reported that DSC-PWI could be used to predict the median time to progression in gliomas and that a lower rCBV corresponds to significantly prolonged progression-free survival. However, these authors did not investigate the rCBV-related molecular mechanisms such as IDH mutation. Our data suggest that rCBV_max values are significantly associated with the IDH mutational status. Recent research showed that IDH mutation leads to 2HG (an activator of Egl-9 prolyl-4-hydroxylases) accumulation, resulting in decreased hypoxia-inducible-factor 1-α activation and downstream inhibition of angiogenesis-related signaling.^38,40 As demonstrated by Kickingereder et al¹⁸ that IDH-mutant and wild-type tumors were both associated with distinct imaging phenotypes and were predictable with rCBV imaging in a clinical setting, rCBV maps were used to evaluate IDH mutational status of high-grade gliomas with similar results (ie, IDH mutant tumors represented considerably lower rCBV).³⁵ Similarly, the rCBV_max values in our cases with IDH mutation were significantly lower than wild types. Therefore, our findings are in good agreement with prior results and theories. In this study, IDH-mutated grade II and III astrocytomas were found to correlate with higher ADC_min and rADC and lower rCBV; this correlation corresponds to low levels of cellular density and angiogenesis. These relationships may explain why IDH mutation is an independent favorable prognostic marker in patients with gliomas.^{14⇓⇓⇓⇓–19} Glioblastoma is the most common malignant and fatal type of brain tumor, with a poor prognosis.^5,10 Although the presence of an IDH mutation is a strong, independent prognostic factor in gliomas, it had been shown that even IDH-mutated glioblastomas exhibited clinical outcomes similar to those of grade III astrocytomas without IDH mutation.⁶ The IDH mutation is relatively rare in glioblastomas because it is associated with secondary but not primary tumors.⁵ Thus, glioblastomas were excluded from our study.

IDH mutation in diffuse gliomas has been considered the most robust prognostic implication in previous studies.^{10⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–17} IDH mutation was associated with a significantly better clinical outcome with 5-year overall survival (93% compared with 51% for wild type).¹⁷ Although our results demonstrated that MR imaging parameters could noninvasively predict IDH mutational status in WHO grade II and III astrocytomas, the correlation between imaging parameters and clinical outcomes has not been studied because of the retrospective nature of this study and a short-term follow-up. Nevertheless, a few studies have demonstrated that low ADC values related directly to poor survival in high-grade astrocytomas and that rCBV values were positively correlated with median time to progression in patients with gliomas.^32,39,41,42

There are a few limitations to this study. It has inherent biases associated with retrospective analyses and a relatively small sample size. A multicentered prospective investigation with a larger sample size is warranted to verify these results and ensure the reproducibility. Second, owing to the short-term follow-up, the clinical outcomes are not available. Imaging parameters as predictors of clinical outcomes should be further studied in larger, prospective trials. Third, the classic biomarker of the human p53 tumor suppressor gene (TP53) mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was not used in this study for case grouping due to lack of relevant molecular pathologic data in our research. Finally, tumor borders were defined with reference to high signal intensity on T2WI and FLAIR, but it is difficult to differentiate tumor infiltration and peritumoral edema merely on the basis of their radiologic appearance.

Conclusions

Compared with IDH wild-type tumors, IDH-mutant tumors tend to have a higher ADC_min and rADC and a lower rCBV_max. Application of cMRI with advanced imaging modalities such as DWI and DSC-PWI is useful to predict IDH mutational status in grade II and III astrocytomas and may provide an important, noninvasive, surrogate marker that should be studied further and clinically correlated in larger, prospective trials.

Footnotes

Zhen Xing and Xiefeng Yang contributed equally to this work.
This work was supported by the Leading Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Fujian Province (No. 2016Y0101) to Dairong Cao, Special Funds of the Provincial Finance of Fujian Province (No. BPB-CDR2013) to Dairong Cao, and the Research Foundation for Young Scholars of the Health Department of Fujian Province (No. 2013–1-34) to Zhen Xing.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

1.↵
2. Daumas-Duport C,
3. Scheithauer B,
4. O'Fallon J, et al
. Grading of astrocytomas: a simple and reproducible method. Cancer 1988;62:2152–65 pmid:3179928
CrossRef PubMed
2.↵
2. Fuller GN,
3. Scheithauer BW
. The 2007 Revised World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System: newly codified entities. Brain Pathol 2007;17:304–07 doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00084.x pmid:17598822
CrossRef PubMed
3.↵
2. van den Bent MJ
. Interobserver variation of the histopathological diagnosis in clinical trials on glioma: a clinician's perspective. Acta Neuropathol 2010;120:297–304 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0725-7 pmid:20644945
CrossRef PubMed
4.↵
2. Louis DN,
3. Perry A,
4. Reifenberger G, et al
. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931
CrossRef PubMed
5.↵
2. Parsons DW,
3. Jones S,
4. Zhang X, et al
. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008;321:1807–12 doi:10.1126/science.1164382 pmid:18772396
Abstract/FREE Full Text
6.↵
2. Hartmann C,
3. Meyer J,
4. Balss J, et al
. Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2009;118:469–74 doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0561-9 pmid:19554337
CrossRef PubMed
7.↵
2. Yan H,
3. Parsons DW,
4. Jin G, et al
. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009;360:765–73 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 pmid:19228619
CrossRef PubMed
8.↵
2. Balss J,
3. Meyer J,
4. Mueller W, et al
. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol 2008;116:597–602 doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0455-2 pmid:18985363
CrossRef PubMed
9.↵
2. Watanabe T,
3. Nobusawa S,
4. Kleihues P, et al
. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol 2009;174:1149–53 doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080958 pmid:19246647
CrossRef PubMed
10.↵
2. Olar A,
3. Wani KM,
4. Alfaro-Munoz KD, et al
. IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II–III diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:585–96 doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1398-z pmid:25701198
CrossRef PubMed
11.↵
2. Nikiforova MN,
3. Hamilton RL
. Molecular diagnostics of gliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:558–68 doi:10.1043/2010-0649-RAIR pmid:21526954
CrossRef PubMed
12.↵
2. Reuss DE,
3. Mamatjan Y,
4. Schrimpf D, et al
. IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:867–73 doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1438-8 pmid:25962792
CrossRef PubMed
13.↵
2. Sanson M,
3. Marie Y,
4. Paris S, et al
. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4150–54 doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9832 pmid:19636000
Abstract/FREE Full Text
14.↵
2. Bleeker FE,
3. Atai NA,
4. Lamba S, et al
. The prognostic IDH1 (R132) mutation is associated with reduced NADP+-dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119:487–94 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0645-6 pmid:20127344
CrossRef PubMed
15.↵
2. Krell D,
3. Mulholland P,
4. Frampton AE, et al
. IDH mutations in tumorigenesis and their potential role as novel therapeutic targets. Future Oncol 2013;9:1923–35 doi:10.2217/fon.13.143 pmid:24295421
CrossRef PubMed
16.↵
2. Rohle D,
3. Popovici-Muller J,
4. Palaskas N, et al
. An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 2013;340:626–30 doi:10.1126/science.1236062 pmid:23558169
Abstract/FREE Full Text
17.↵
2. Metellus P,
3. Coulibaly B,
4. Colin C, et al
. Absence of IDH mutation identifies a novel radiologic and molecular subtype of WHO grade II gliomas with dismal prognosis. Acta Neuropathol 2010;120:719–29 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0777-8 pmid:21080178
CrossRef PubMed
18.↵
2. Kickingereder P,
3. Sahm F,
4. Radbruch A, et al
. IDH mutation status is associated with a distinct hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptome signature which is non-invasively predictable with rCBV imaging in human glioma. Sci Rep 2015;5:16238 doi:10.1038/srep16238 pmid:26538165
CrossRef PubMed
19.↵
2. Schaefer PW,
3. Grant PE,
4. Gonzalez RG
. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217:331–45 doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 pmid:11058626
CrossRef PubMed
20.↵
2. Le Bihan D
. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:469–80 doi:10.1038/nrn1119 pmid:12778119
CrossRef PubMed
21.↵
2. Humphries PD,
3. Sebire NJ,
4. Siegel MJ, et al
. Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology 2007;245:848–54 doi:10.1148/radiol.2452061535 pmid:17951348
CrossRef PubMed
22.↵
2. Guzmán-De-Villoria JA,
3. Mateos-Pérez JM,
4. Fernández-García P, et al
. Added value of advanced over conventional magnetic resonance imaging in grading gliomas and other primary brain tumors. Cancer Imaging 2014;14:1–10 doi:10.1186/s40644-014-0035-8 pmid:25608821
CrossRef PubMed
23.↵
2. Cuccarini V,
3. Erbetta A,
4. Farinotti M, et al
. Advanced MRI may complement histological diagnosis of lower grade gliomas and help in predicting survival. J Neurooncol 2016;126:279–88 doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1960-5 pmid:26468137
CrossRef PubMed
24.↵
2. Jain R,
3. Gutierrez J,
4. Narang J, et al
. In vivo correlation of tumor blood volume and permeability with histologic and molecular angiogenic markers in gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:388–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2280 pmid:21071537
Abstract/FREE Full Text
25.↵
2. Tan WL,
3. Huang WY,
4. Yin B, et al
. Can diffusion tensor imaging noninvasively detect IDH1 gene mutations in astrogliomas? A retrospective study of 112 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:920–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3803 pmid:24557705
Abstract/FREE Full Text
26.↵
2. Khayal IS,
3. Vandenberg SR,
4. Smith KJ, et al
. MRI apparent diffusion coefficient reflects histopathologic subtype, axonal disruption, and tumor fraction in diffuse-type grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:1192–201 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor122 pmid:21865401
Abstract/FREE Full Text
27.↵
2. Sonoda Y,
3. Shibahara I,
4. Kawaguchi T, et al
. Association between molecular alterations and tumor location and MRI characteristics in anaplastic gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 2015;32:99–104 doi:10.1007/s10014-014-0211-3 pmid:25537428
CrossRef PubMed
28.↵
2. Carrillo JA,
3. Lai A,
4. Nghiemphu PL, et al
. Relationship between tumor enhancement, edema, IDH1 mutational status, MGMT promoter methylation, and survival in glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1349–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2950 pmid:22322613
Abstract/FREE Full Text
29.↵
2. Wetzel SG,
3. Cha S,
4. Johnson G, et al
. Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology 2002;224:797–803 doi:10.1148/radiol.2243011014 pmid:12202717
CrossRef PubMed
30.↵
2. Kato Y,
3. Jin G,
4. Kuan CT, et al
. A monoclonal antibody IMab-1 specifically recognizes IDH1R132H, the most common glioma-derived mutation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009;390:547–51 doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.001 pmid:19818334
CrossRef PubMed
31.↵
2. Takano S,
3. Tian W,
4. Matsuda M, et al
. Detection of IDH1 mutation in human gliomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and sequencing. Brain Tumor Pathol 2011;28:115–23 doi:10.1007/s10014-011-0023-7 pmid:21344322
CrossRef PubMed
32.↵
2. Higano S,
3. Yun X,
4. Kumabe T, et al
. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology 2006;241:839–46 doi:10.1148/radiol.2413051276 pmid:17032910
CrossRef PubMed
33.↵
2. Murakami R,
3. Hirai T,
4. Sugahara T, et al
. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method. Radiology 2009;251:838–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.2513080899 pmid:19318585
CrossRef PubMed
34.↵
2. Lee EJ,
3. Lee SK,
4. Agid R, et al
. Preoperative grading of presumptive low-grade astrocytomas on MR imaging: diagnostic value of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1872–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1254 pmid:18719036
Abstract/FREE Full Text
35.↵
2. Lee S,
3. Choi SH,
4. Ryoo I, et al
. Evaluation of the microenvironmental heterogeneity in high-grade gliomas with IDH1/2 gene mutation using histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging. J Neurooncol 2015;121:141–50 doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1614-z pmid:25205290
CrossRef PubMed
36.↵
2. Dang L,
3. White DW,
4. Gross S, et al
. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 2009;462:739–44 doi:10.1038/nature08617 pmid:19935646
CrossRef PubMed
37.↵
2. Xiong J,
3. Tan W,
4. Wen J, et al
. Combination of diffusion tensor imaging and conventional MRI correlates with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutations but not 1p/19q genotyping in oligodendroglial tumours. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1705–15 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4025-4 pmid:26396108
CrossRef PubMed
38.↵
2. Losman JA,
3. Looper R,
4. Koivunen P, et al
. (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate is sufficient to promote leukemogenesis and its effects are reversible. Science 2013;339:1621–25 doi:10.1126/science.1231677 pmid:23393090
Abstract/FREE Full Text
39.↵
2. Law M,
3. Young RJ,
4. Babb JS, et al
. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247:490–98 doi:10.1148/radiol.2472070898 pmid:18349315
CrossRef PubMed
40.↵
2. Koivunen P,
3. Lee S,
4. Duncan CG, et al
. Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature 2012;483:484–88 doi:10.1038/nature10898 pmid:22343896
CrossRef PubMed
41.↵
2. Mangla R,
3. Ginat DT,
4. Kamalian S, et al
. Correlation between progression free survival and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion in WHO grade III glioma subtypes. J Neurooncol 2014;116:325–31 doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1298-9 pmid:24178441
CrossRef PubMed
42.↵
2. Zulfiqar M,
3. Yousem DM,
4. Lai H
. ADC values and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas: does lower ADC predict a worse prognosis independent of grade of tumor? A meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:624–29 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8679 pmid:23436853
CrossRef PubMed

Received October 22, 2016.
Accepted after revision February 6, 2017.

View Abstract

In this issue

Download PDF

Email Article

Citation Tools

Purchase

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Show more ADULT BRAIN

[1] 1.↵

Daumas-Duport C,
Scheithauer B,
O'Fallon J, et al
. Grading of astrocytomas: a simple and reproducible method. Cancer 1988;62:2152–65 pmid:3179928
CrossRef PubMed

[3] Daumas-Duport C,

[4] Scheithauer B,

[5] O'Fallon J, et al

[6] 2.↵

Fuller GN,
Scheithauer BW
. The 2007 Revised World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System: newly codified entities. Brain Pathol 2007;17:304–07 doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00084.x pmid:17598822
CrossRef PubMed

[8] Fuller GN,

[9] Scheithauer BW

[10] 3.↵

van den Bent MJ
. Interobserver variation of the histopathological diagnosis in clinical trials on glioma: a clinician's perspective. Acta Neuropathol 2010;120:297–304 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0725-7 pmid:20644945
CrossRef PubMed

[12] van den Bent MJ

[13] 4.↵

Louis DN,
Perry A,
Reifenberger G, et al
. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931
CrossRef PubMed

[15] Louis DN,

[16] Perry A,

[17] Reifenberger G, et al

[18] 5.↵

Parsons DW,
Jones S,
Zhang X, et al
. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008;321:1807–12 doi:10.1126/science.1164382 pmid:18772396
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[20] Parsons DW,

[21] Jones S,

[22] Zhang X, et al

[23] 6.↵

Hartmann C,
Meyer J,
Balss J, et al
. Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2009;118:469–74 doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0561-9 pmid:19554337
CrossRef PubMed

[25] Hartmann C,

[26] Meyer J,

[27] Balss J, et al

[28] 7.↵

Yan H,
Parsons DW,
Jin G, et al
. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009;360:765–73 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 pmid:19228619
CrossRef PubMed

[30] Yan H,

[31] Parsons DW,

[32] Jin G, et al

[33] 8.↵

Balss J,
Meyer J,
Mueller W, et al
. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol 2008;116:597–602 doi:10.1007/s00401-008-0455-2 pmid:18985363
CrossRef PubMed

[35] Balss J,

[36] Meyer J,

[37] Mueller W, et al

[38] 9.↵

Watanabe T,
Nobusawa S,
Kleihues P, et al
. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol 2009;174:1149–53 doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080958 pmid:19246647
CrossRef PubMed

[40] Watanabe T,

[41] Nobusawa S,

[42] Kleihues P, et al

[43] 10.↵

Olar A,
Wani KM,
Alfaro-Munoz KD, et al
. IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II–III diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:585–96 doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1398-z pmid:25701198
CrossRef PubMed

[45] Olar A,

[46] Wani KM,

[47] Alfaro-Munoz KD, et al

[48] 11.↵

Nikiforova MN,
Hamilton RL
. Molecular diagnostics of gliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:558–68 doi:10.1043/2010-0649-RAIR pmid:21526954
CrossRef PubMed

[50] Nikiforova MN,

[51] Hamilton RL

[52] 12.↵

Reuss DE,
Mamatjan Y,
Schrimpf D, et al
. IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:867–73 doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1438-8 pmid:25962792
CrossRef PubMed

[54] Reuss DE,

[55] Mamatjan Y,

[56] Schrimpf D, et al

[57] 13.↵

Sanson M,
Marie Y,
Paris S, et al
. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4150–54 doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9832 pmid:19636000
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[59] Sanson M,

[60] Marie Y,

[61] Paris S, et al

[62] 14.↵

Bleeker FE,
Atai NA,
Lamba S, et al
. The prognostic IDH1 (R132) mutation is associated with reduced NADP+-dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119:487–94 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0645-6 pmid:20127344
CrossRef PubMed

[64] Bleeker FE,

[65] Atai NA,

[66] Lamba S, et al

[67] 15.↵

Krell D,
Mulholland P,
Frampton AE, et al
. IDH mutations in tumorigenesis and their potential role as novel therapeutic targets. Future Oncol 2013;9:1923–35 doi:10.2217/fon.13.143 pmid:24295421
CrossRef PubMed

[69] Krell D,

[70] Mulholland P,

[71] Frampton AE, et al

[72] 16.↵

Rohle D,
Popovici-Muller J,
Palaskas N, et al
. An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 2013;340:626–30 doi:10.1126/science.1236062 pmid:23558169
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[74] Rohle D,

[75] Popovici-Muller J,

[76] Palaskas N, et al

[77] 17.↵

Metellus P,
Coulibaly B,
Colin C, et al
. Absence of IDH mutation identifies a novel radiologic and molecular subtype of WHO grade II gliomas with dismal prognosis. Acta Neuropathol 2010;120:719–29 doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0777-8 pmid:21080178
CrossRef PubMed

[79] Metellus P,

[80] Coulibaly B,

[81] Colin C, et al

[82] 18.↵

Kickingereder P,
Sahm F,
Radbruch A, et al
. IDH mutation status is associated with a distinct hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptome signature which is non-invasively predictable with rCBV imaging in human glioma. Sci Rep 2015;5:16238 doi:10.1038/srep16238 pmid:26538165
CrossRef PubMed

[84] Kickingereder P,

[85] Sahm F,

[86] Radbruch A, et al

[87] 19.↵

Schaefer PW,
Grant PE,
Gonzalez RG
. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217:331–45 doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 pmid:11058626
CrossRef PubMed

[89] Schaefer PW,

[90] Grant PE,

[91] Gonzalez RG

[92] 20.↵

Le Bihan D
. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:469–80 doi:10.1038/nrn1119 pmid:12778119
CrossRef PubMed

[94] Le Bihan D

[95] 21.↵

Humphries PD,
Sebire NJ,
Siegel MJ, et al
. Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology 2007;245:848–54 doi:10.1148/radiol.2452061535 pmid:17951348
CrossRef PubMed

[97] Humphries PD,

[98] Sebire NJ,

[99] Siegel MJ, et al

[100] 22.↵

Guzmán-De-Villoria JA,
Mateos-Pérez JM,
Fernández-García P, et al
. Added value of advanced over conventional magnetic resonance imaging in grading gliomas and other primary brain tumors. Cancer Imaging 2014;14:1–10 doi:10.1186/s40644-014-0035-8 pmid:25608821
CrossRef PubMed

[102] Guzmán-De-Villoria JA,

[103] Mateos-Pérez JM,

[104] Fernández-García P, et al

[105] 23.↵

Cuccarini V,
Erbetta A,
Farinotti M, et al
. Advanced MRI may complement histological diagnosis of lower grade gliomas and help in predicting survival. J Neurooncol 2016;126:279–88 doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1960-5 pmid:26468137
CrossRef PubMed

[107] Cuccarini V,

[108] Erbetta A,

[109] Farinotti M, et al

[110] 24.↵

Jain R,
Gutierrez J,
Narang J, et al
. In vivo correlation of tumor blood volume and permeability with histologic and molecular angiogenic markers in gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:388–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2280 pmid:21071537
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[112] Jain R,

[113] Gutierrez J,

[114] Narang J, et al

[115] 25.↵

Tan WL,
Huang WY,
Yin B, et al
. Can diffusion tensor imaging noninvasively detect IDH1 gene mutations in astrogliomas? A retrospective study of 112 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:920–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3803 pmid:24557705
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[117] Tan WL,

[118] Huang WY,

[119] Yin B, et al

[120] 26.↵

Khayal IS,
Vandenberg SR,
Smith KJ, et al
. MRI apparent diffusion coefficient reflects histopathologic subtype, axonal disruption, and tumor fraction in diffuse-type grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:1192–201 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor122 pmid:21865401
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[122] Khayal IS,

[123] Vandenberg SR,

[124] Smith KJ, et al

[125] 27.↵

Sonoda Y,
Shibahara I,
Kawaguchi T, et al
. Association between molecular alterations and tumor location and MRI characteristics in anaplastic gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 2015;32:99–104 doi:10.1007/s10014-014-0211-3 pmid:25537428
CrossRef PubMed

[127] Sonoda Y,

[128] Shibahara I,

[129] Kawaguchi T, et al

[130] 28.↵

Carrillo JA,
Lai A,
Nghiemphu PL, et al
. Relationship between tumor enhancement, edema, IDH1 mutational status, MGMT promoter methylation, and survival in glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1349–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2950 pmid:22322613
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[132] Carrillo JA,

[133] Lai A,

[134] Nghiemphu PL, et al

[135] 29.↵

Wetzel SG,
Cha S,
Johnson G, et al
. Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology 2002;224:797–803 doi:10.1148/radiol.2243011014 pmid:12202717
CrossRef PubMed

[137] Wetzel SG,

[138] Cha S,

[139] Johnson G, et al

[140] 30.↵

Kato Y,
Jin G,
Kuan CT, et al
. A monoclonal antibody IMab-1 specifically recognizes IDH1R132H, the most common glioma-derived mutation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009;390:547–51 doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.001 pmid:19818334
CrossRef PubMed

[142] Kato Y,

[143] Jin G,

[144] Kuan CT, et al

[145] 31.↵

Takano S,
Tian W,
Matsuda M, et al
. Detection of IDH1 mutation in human gliomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and sequencing. Brain Tumor Pathol 2011;28:115–23 doi:10.1007/s10014-011-0023-7 pmid:21344322
CrossRef PubMed

[147] Takano S,

[148] Tian W,

[149] Matsuda M, et al

[150] 32.↵

Higano S,
Yun X,
Kumabe T, et al
. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology 2006;241:839–46 doi:10.1148/radiol.2413051276 pmid:17032910
CrossRef PubMed

[152] Higano S,

[153] Yun X,

[154] Kumabe T, et al

[155] 33.↵

Murakami R,
Hirai T,
Sugahara T, et al
. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method. Radiology 2009;251:838–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.2513080899 pmid:19318585
CrossRef PubMed

[157] Murakami R,

[158] Hirai T,

[159] Sugahara T, et al

[160] 34.↵

Lee EJ,
Lee SK,
Agid R, et al
. Preoperative grading of presumptive low-grade astrocytomas on MR imaging: diagnostic value of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1872–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1254 pmid:18719036
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[162] Lee EJ,

[163] Lee SK,

[164] Agid R, et al

[165] 35.↵

Lee S,
Choi SH,
Ryoo I, et al
. Evaluation of the microenvironmental heterogeneity in high-grade gliomas with IDH1/2 gene mutation using histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging. J Neurooncol 2015;121:141–50 doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1614-z pmid:25205290
CrossRef PubMed

[167] Lee S,

[168] Choi SH,

[169] Ryoo I, et al

[170] 36.↵

Dang L,
White DW,
Gross S, et al
. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 2009;462:739–44 doi:10.1038/nature08617 pmid:19935646
CrossRef PubMed

[172] Dang L,

[173] White DW,

[174] Gross S, et al

[175] 37.↵

Xiong J,
Tan W,
Wen J, et al
. Combination of diffusion tensor imaging and conventional MRI correlates with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutations but not 1p/19q genotyping in oligodendroglial tumours. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1705–15 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4025-4 pmid:26396108
CrossRef PubMed

[177] Xiong J,

[178] Tan W,

[179] Wen J, et al

[180] 38.↵

Losman JA,
Looper R,
Koivunen P, et al
. (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate is sufficient to promote leukemogenesis and its effects are reversible. Science 2013;339:1621–25 doi:10.1126/science.1231677 pmid:23393090
Abstract/FREE Full Text

[182] Losman JA,

[183] Looper R,

[184] Koivunen P, et al

[185] 39.↵

Law M,
Young RJ,
Babb JS, et al
. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247:490–98 doi:10.1148/radiol.2472070898 pmid:18349315
CrossRef PubMed

[187] Law M,

[188] Young RJ,

[189] Babb JS, et al

[190] 40.↵

Koivunen P,
Lee S,
Duncan CG, et al
. Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature 2012;483:484–88 doi:10.1038/nature10898 pmid:22343896
CrossRef PubMed

[192] Koivunen P,

[193] Lee S,

[194] Duncan CG, et al

[195] 41.↵

Mangla R,
Ginat DT,
Kamalian S, et al
. Correlation between progression free survival and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion in WHO grade III glioma subtypes. J Neurooncol 2014;116:325–31 doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1298-9 pmid:24178441
CrossRef PubMed

[197] Mangla R,

[198] Ginat DT,

[199] Kamalian S, et al

[200] 42.↵

Zulfiqar M,
Yousem DM,
Lai H
. ADC values and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas: does lower ADC predict a worse prognosis independent of grade of tumor? A meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:624–29 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8679 pmid:23436853
CrossRef PubMed

[202] Zulfiqar M,

[203] Yousem DM,

[204] Lai H

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Noninvasive Assessment of IDH Mutational Status in World Health Organization Grade II and III Astrocytomas Using DWI and DSC-PWI Combined with Conventional MR Imaging

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Patients

MR Imaging Techniques

Data Processing

Immunohistochemistry Staining

DNA Sequencing

Data Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology

Main menu

User menu

Search

Noninvasive Assessment of IDH Mutational Status in World Health Organization Grade II and III Astrocytomas Using DWI and DSC-PWI Combined with Conventional MR Imaging

Abstract

ABBREVIATIONS:

Materials and Methods

Patients

MR Imaging Techniques

Data Processing

Immunohistochemistry Staining

DNA Sequencing

Data Analysis

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

References

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Jump to section

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

News and Updates

Resources

Opportunities

American Society of Neuroradiology