1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [06bafb99-8b36-46f5-b85f-b2545a4952b8] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 06bafb99-8b36-46f5-b85f-b2545a4952b8 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [93c28507-3cc2-4aea-933a-480feada7f1c] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 93c28507-3cc2-4aea-933a-480feada7f1c [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;86e609fd95f49e3926e2176f3608b2921c10d483 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [fefe39be-e17e-4886-8bda-2909c7c62355] => Array ( [runtime-id] => fefe39be-e17e-4886-8bda-2909c7c62355 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [ac010e06-7bb9-4322-bafc-36df21c9ef5b] => Array ( [runtime-id] => ac010e06-7bb9-4322-bafc-36df21c9ef5b [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;86e609fd95f49e3926e2176f3608b2921c10d483 ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Nguyen, T.B. AU - Zakhari, N. AU - Velasco Sandoval, S. AU - Guarnizo-Capera, A. AU - Alexios Gulak, M. AU - Woulfe, J. AU - Jansen, G. AU - Thornhill, R. AU - Majtenyi, N. AU - Cron, G.O. TI - Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin-Labeling, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and DSC Perfusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Prospective Study AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A7771 DP - 2023 Feb 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 134--142 VI - 44 IP - 2 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/44/2/134.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/44/2/134.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2023 Feb 01; 44 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For patients with high-grade gliomas, the appearance of a new, enhancing lesion after surgery and chemoradiation represents a diagnostic dilemma. We hypothesized that MR perfusion without and with contrast can differentiate tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we performed 3 MR perfusion methods: arterial spin-labeling, DSC, and dynamic contrast enhancement. For each lesion, we measured CBF from arterial spin-labeling, uncorrected relative CBV, and leakage-corrected relative CBV from DSC imaging. The volume transfer constant and plasma volume were obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging without and with T1 mapping using modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI). The diagnosis of tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis was determined by either histopathology for patients who underwent re-resection or radiologic follow-up for patients who did not have re-resection.RESULTS: There were 26 patients with 32 lesions, 19 lesions with tumor recurrence and 13 lesions with radiation necrosis. Compared with radiation necrosis, lesions with tumor recurrence had higher CBF (P = .033), leakage-corrected relative CBV (P = .048), and plasma volume using MOLLI T1 mapping (P = .012). For differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis, the areas under the curve were 0.81 for CBF, 0.80 for plasma volume using MOLLI T1 mapping, and 0.71 for leakage-corrected relative CBV. A correlation was found between CBF and leakage-corrected relative CBV (rs = 0.54), volume transfer constant, and plasma volume (0.50 < rs< 0.77) but not with uncorrected relative CBV (rs = 0.20, P = .29).CONCLUSIONS: In the differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in a newly enhancing lesion, the diagnostic value of arterial spin-labeling–derived CBF is similar to that of DSC and dynamic contrast-enhancement–derived blood volume.ASLarterial spin-labelingAUCarea under the curveDCEdynamic contrast-enhancedKtransvolume transfer constantMOLLImodified Look-Locker inversion recoverypCASLpseudocontinuous pulse ASLrCBVrelative CBV (CBV lesion/CBV normal contralateral white matter)ROCreceiver operating characteristicSIsignal intensitySMART1Mapsaturation method using adaptive recovery times for cardiac T1 mappingVpplasma volume