1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [16d14d8c-b3eb-48ce-9aaf-e5dab4496a93] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 16d14d8c-b3eb-48ce-9aaf-e5dab4496a93 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [96331b34-b70f-4bcd-947e-cf182a9f342d] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 96331b34-b70f-4bcd-947e-cf182a9f342d [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;5d1e22e09c7d795b7b5ddd3f75b0fc3486ca84a8 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [635cdb3a-fea4-4312-85d6-189648b8b415] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 635cdb3a-fea4-4312-85d6-189648b8b415 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [8714523a-2f85-4aa8-8753-579731282837] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 8714523a-2f85-4aa8-8753-579731282837 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;5d1e22e09c7d795b7b5ddd3f75b0fc3486ca84a8 ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hähnel, Stefan AU - Trossbach, Manuel AU - Braun, Cora AU - Heiland, Sabine AU - Knauth, Michael AU - Sartor, Klaus AU - Hartmann, Marius TI - Small-Vessel Stents for Intracranial Angioplasty: In Vitro Comparison of Different Stent Designs and Sizes by Using CT Angiography DP - 2003 Sep 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1512--1516 VI - 24 IP - 8 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/24/8/1512.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/24/8/1512.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2003 Sep 01; 24 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate whether CT angiography is a suitable alternative to conventional angiography in the evaluation of small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty.METHODS: CT angiographic appearances of 23 stents of different designs and sizes (2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm) were investigated after they were filled with a solution of 0.9% NaCl or diluted contrast medium. For each stent, artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was measured, and the difference in the number of pixels with a Hounsfield value below 200 HU between the two filling states, DIFFHU<200, was calculated to provide an objective indicator of the size of the evaluable stent diameter.RESULTS: With a window width of 1500 HU at a window level of 400 HU, ALN ranged from 66.8% to 97.7% in the group of 2.0-mm stents and from 38.6% to 66.8% in the groups of 3.0- and 4.0-mm stents. For the 2.0-mm stents, DIFFHU<200 was zero. In the groups of 3.0- and 4.0-mm stents, DIFFHU<200 ranged from 0.3 to 6.7, corresponding to a diameter of 0.13–3.0 mm, when the pixel size was presupposed to be 0.449 mm.CONCLUSION: CT angiographic evaluation of small-vessel patency after stent placement is considerably impaired by ALN. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic studies such as CT angiography.