1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lee, Jeong Sub AU - Kim, John AU - Bapuraj, Jayapalli R. AU - Srinivasan, Ashok TI - Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A8276 DP - 2024 Sep 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1322--1326 VI - 45 IP - 9 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/45/9/1322.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/45/9/1322.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2024 Sep 01; 45 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently, there is a lack of research directly comparing photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in pediatric temporal bone CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of temporal bone CT scans in pediatric patients acquired with PCD-CT and EID-CT.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included a total of 110 pediatric temporal bone CT scans (PCD-CT, n = 52; EID-CT, n = 58). Two independent readers evaluated the spatial resolution of 4 anatomic structures (tympanic membrane, incudostapedial joint, stapedial crura, and cochlear modiolus) and overall image quality by using a 4-point scale. Interreader agreement was assessed. Dose-length product for each CT was compared, and subgroup analyses were performed based on age (younger than 3 years, 3–5 years, 6–11 years, and 12 years and above).RESULTS: PCD-CT demonstrated statistically significantly higher scores than EID-CT for all items (tympanic membrane, 2.9 versus 2.4; incudostapedial joint, 3.6 versus 2.6; stapedial crura, 3.2 versus 2.4; cochlear modiolus, 3.4 versus 2.8; overall image quality, 3.6 versus 2.8; P < .05). Interreader agreement ranged from good to excellent (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.6–0.81). PCD-CT exhibited a 43% dose reduction compared with EID-CT, with a particularly substantial reduction of over 70% in the subgroups of children younger than 6 years.CONCLUSIONS: PCD temporal bone CT achieves significantly superior imaging quality at a lower radiation dose compared with EID-CT.AECautomatic exposure controlDLPdose-length productEID-CTenergy-integrating detector CTICCinterclass correlation coefficientPCD-CTphoton-counting detector CT