1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => OpenAccess
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU - Vano, E.
AU - Fernandez, J.M.
AU - Sanchez, R.M.
AU - Martinez, D.
AU - Ibor, L. Lopez
AU - Gil, A.
AU - Serna-Candel, C.
TI - Patient Radiation Dose Management in the Follow-Up of Potential Skin Injuries in Neuroradiology
AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A3211
DP - 2013 Feb 01
TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG - 277--282
VI - 34
IP - 2
4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/34/2/277.short
4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/34/2/277.full
SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2013 Feb 01; 34
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation exposure from neurointerventional procedures can be substantial, with risk of radiation injuries. We present the results of a follow-up program applied to potential skin injuries in interventional neuroradiology based on North American and European guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following guidelines approved in 2009 by SIR and CIRSE have been used over the last 2 years to identify patients with potential skin injuries requiring clinical follow-up: peak skin dose >3 Gy, air kerma at the patient entrance reference point >5 Gy, kerma area product >500 Gy ยท cm2, or fluoroscopy time >60 minutes. RESULTS: A total of 708 procedures (325 in 2009 and 383 in 2010) were included in the study. After analyzing each dose report, 19 patients (5.9%) were included in a follow-up program for potential skin injuries in 2009, while in 2010, after introducing several optimizing actions and refining the selection criteria, only 4 patients (1.0%) needed follow-up. Over the last 2 years, only 3 patients required referral to a dermatology service. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the guidelines to patient radiation dose management helped standardize the selection criteria for including patients in the clinical follow-up program of potential skin radiation injuries. The peak skin dose resulted in the most relevant parameter. The refinement of selection criteria and the introduction of a low-dose protocol in the x-ray system, combined with a training program focused on radiation protection, reduced the number of patients requiring clinical follow-up. CIRSECardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of EuropeDAPdose-area productDOLIRdose on-line for interventional radiologyICRPInternational Commission on Radiologic ProtectionSIRSociety of Interventional Radiology