1naresh2naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [a08fc11c-8a98-4668-b079-218c7ef5470f] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => a08fc11c-8a98-4668-b079-218c7ef5470f
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [318d1911-4748-4c19-9526-1b185ce544c6] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => 318d1911-4748-4c19-9526-1b185ce544c6
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;1ab3c7b5c8c74345063cc31ad2ada9bcb11b583b
                )

        )

)
1naresh2naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [00617224-9e6d-4480-8e19-5f6d767c87d0] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => 00617224-9e6d-4480-8e19-5f6d767c87d0
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [d259fd42-01c3-44f9-9771-82edbded9310] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => d259fd42-01c3-44f9-9771-82edbded9310
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;1ab3c7b5c8c74345063cc31ad2ada9bcb11b583b
                )

        )

)
PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Eugène, F.
AU  - Gauvrit, J.-Y.
AU  - Ferré, J.-C.
AU  - Gentric, J.-C.
AU  - Besseghir, A.
AU  - Ronzière, T.
AU  - Raoult, H.
TI  - One-Year MR Angiographic and Clinical Follow-Up after Intracranial Mechanical Thrombectomy Using a Stent Retriever Device
AID  - 10.3174/ajnr.A4071
DP  - 2015 Jan 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 126--132
VI  - 36
IP  - 1
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/1/126.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/1/126.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2015 Jan 01; 36
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the consequences of arterial wall damage that may be due to mechanical endovascular thrombectomy. Our aim was to perform 1-year MR angiographic and clinical follow-up of patients treated with mechanical endovascular thrombectomy using the Solitaire device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stroke treated between August 2010 and July 2012 were prospectively evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 1 year after mechanical endovascular thrombectomy. Angiographic follow-up was performed on a 3T MR imaging scanner and included intracranial artery TOF MRA and supra-aortic artery gadolinium-enhanced MRA. Images were assessed to detect arterial abnormalities (stenosis, occlusion, dilation) and were compared with the final post-mechanical endovascular thrombectomy run to differentiate delayed and pre-existing abnormalities. Clinical evaluation was performed with the mRS and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire quality-of-life scale. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were angiographically assessed at the mean term of 19 ± 4 months. MRA showed intracranial artery abnormalities in 10 patients, including 5 delayed intracranial artery abnormalities in 4 patients (4 stenoses and 1 dilation), 4 cases of pre-existing intracranial artery stenosis, and 2 occlusions. Pre-existing etiologic cervical artery stenosis or occlusion was observed in 2 patients. All these patients remained asymptomatic during the follow-up period. A significant clinical improvement was observed at 1-year follow-up in comparison with 3-month follow-up (P < .0001), with a good outcome achieved in 62.5% of patients and an acceptable quality of life restored. CONCLUSIONS: One-year follow-up identifies delayed asymptomatic arterial abnormalities in patients treated with the Solitaire device. FUfollow-upMETmechanical endovascular thrombectomySF-3636-Item Short-Form Health Survey QuestionnaireTOASTTrial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment