1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [b73eee07-5d3f-4549-bf19-74d644ac4fa7] => Array ( [runtime-id] => b73eee07-5d3f-4549-bf19-74d644ac4fa7 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [c3c10024-6aa6-4e1a-bc4f-ea77dea23ce6] => Array ( [runtime-id] => c3c10024-6aa6-4e1a-bc4f-ea77dea23ce6 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;a9a77aff69a82a8f5f3055e247964fed6ea2213f ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [2d3de4c6-54b1-493d-9a88-7a78c61f2085] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 2d3de4c6-54b1-493d-9a88-7a78c61f2085 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [ceb6004c-b85c-4498-8297-d1b9ee0d575f] => Array ( [runtime-id] => ceb6004c-b85c-4498-8297-d1b9ee0d575f [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;a9a77aff69a82a8f5f3055e247964fed6ea2213f ) ) ) RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Rescue Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications during Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis JF American Journal of Neuroradiology JO Am. J. Neuroradiol. FD American Society of Neuroradiology SP 121 OP 125 DO 10.3174/ajnr.A4066 VO 36 IS 1 A1 Brinjikji, W. A1 Morales-Valero, S.F. A1 Murad, M.H. A1 Cloft, H.J. A1 Kallmes, D.F. YR 2015 UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/1/121.abstract AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraprocedural thrombus formation during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is often treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and, in some instances, fibrinolytic therapy. We performed a meta-analysis evaluating the safety and efficacy of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with fibrinolysis. We also evaluated the safety and efficacy of abciximab, an irreversible inhibitor, compared with tirofiban and eptifibatide, reversible inhibitors of platelet function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies on rescue therapy for intraprocedural thromboembolic complications with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or fibrinolysis during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. We studied rates of periprocedural stroke/hemorrhage, procedure-related morbidity and mortality, immediate arterial recanalization, and long-term good clinical outcome. Event rates were pooled across studies by using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with 516 patients were included. Patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors had significantly lower perioperative morbidity from stroke/hemorrhage compared with those treated with fibrinolytics (11.0%; 95% CI, 7.0%–16.0% versus 29.0%; 95% CI, 13.0%–55.0%; P = .04) and were significantly less likely to have long-term morbidity (16.0%; 95% CI, 11.0%–21.0% versus 35.0%; 95% CI, 17.0%–58.0%; P = .04). There was a trend toward higher recanalization rates among patients treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with those treated with fibrinolytics (72.0%; 95% CI, 64.0%–78.0% versus 50.0%; 95% CI, 28.0%–73.0%; P = .08). Patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide had significantly higher recanalization rates compared with those treated with abciximab (83.0%; 95% CI, 68.0%–91.0% versus 66.0%; 95% CI, 58.0%–74.0%; P = .05). No difference in recanalization was seen in patients receiving intra-arterial (77.0%; 95% CI, 66.0%–85.0%) or intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (70.0%; 95% CI, 57.0%–80.0%, P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Rescue therapy with thrombolytic agents resulted in significantly more morbidity than rescue therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Tirofiban/eptifibatide resulted in significantly higher recanalization rates compared with abciximab. GP IIb/IIIaglycoprotein IIb/IIIaIAintra-arterialTIMIThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction