1naresh2naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [ec571302-6089-4dea-bee9-d6947119b8cb] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => ec571302-6089-4dea-bee9-d6947119b8cb
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [9362d562-9cc7-4e48-95d8-ee36b038c6ef] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => 9362d562-9cc7-4e48-95d8-ee36b038c6ef
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;3f3261e9c0be23074082c1d914e66012953dcaf4
                )

        )

)
1naresh2naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [5f00af35-affa-40e1-9dfa-a11f1495f93d] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => 5f00af35-affa-40e1-9dfa-a11f1495f93d
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [e50fbab4-03ba-4a69-9f1e-2e2e68c02fd1] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => e50fbab4-03ba-4a69-9f1e-2e2e68c02fd1
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;3f3261e9c0be23074082c1d914e66012953dcaf4
                )

        )

)
PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gaddikeri, S.
AU  - Andre, J.B.
AU  - Benjert, J.
AU  - Hippe, D.S.
AU  - Anzai, Y.
TI  - Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT
AID  - 10.3174/ajnr.A4123
DP  - 2015 Feb 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 391--396
VI  - 36
IP  - 2
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/2/391.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/2/391.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2015 Feb 01; 36
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Improved image quality is clinically desired for contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. We compared 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms for the assessment of image quality of contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neck contrast-enhanced CT data from 64 consecutive patients were reconstructed retrospectively by using 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality was assessed by comparing SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, and background noise at levels 1 (mandible) and 2 (superior mediastinum). Two independent blinded readers subjectively graded the image quality on a scale of 1–5, (grade 5 = excellent image quality without artifacts and grade 1 = nondiagnostic image quality with significant artifacts). The percentage of agreement and disagreement between the 2 readers was assessed. RESULTS: Compared with 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction significantly improved the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio at levels 1 and 2. Model-based iterative reconstruction also decreased background noise at level 1 (P = .016), though there was no difference at level 2 (P = .61). Model-based iterative reconstruction was scored higher than 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction by both reviewers at the nasopharynx (P < .001) and oropharynx (P < .001) and for overall image quality (P < .001) and was scored lower at the vocal cords (P < .001) and sternoclavicular junction (P < .001), due to artifacts related to thyroid shielding that were specific for model-based iterative reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based iterative reconstruction offers improved subjective and objective image quality as evidenced by a higher SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio and lower background noise within the same dataset for contrast-enhanced neck CT. Model-based iterative reconstruction has the potential to reduce the radiation dose while maintaining the image quality, with a minor downside being prominent artifacts related to thyroid shield use on model-based iterative reconstruction. ASiR3030% adaptive statistical iterative reconstructionBNbackground noiseCNRcontrast-to-noise ratioFBPfiltered back-projectionHUHounsfield unitsMBIRmodel-based iterative reconstructionPMpectoris muscleSCMsternocleidomastoid muscleSVCsuperior vena cava