1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [1c673dba-ec59-4879-ac44-06261ba09f3a] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 1c673dba-ec59-4879-ac44-06261ba09f3a [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [ed16a6d4-1cd8-4c9f-9d22-b78d55ac72c7] => Array ( [runtime-id] => ed16a6d4-1cd8-4c9f-9d22-b78d55ac72c7 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;797cf3e1d8f0be8f63f0bf0eb22d5d537f29a583 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [abe26a33-95ee-4f5e-a39a-d698c9713e0d] => Array ( [runtime-id] => abe26a33-95ee-4f5e-a39a-d698c9713e0d [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [d745611d-75ce-4cb9-b2a1-ffb0ade90b78] => Array ( [runtime-id] => d745611d-75ce-4cb9-b2a1-ffb0ade90b78 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;797cf3e1d8f0be8f63f0bf0eb22d5d537f29a583 ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Klisch, J. AU - Sychra, V. AU - Strasilla, C. AU - Taschner, C.A. AU - Reinhard, M. AU - Urbach, H. AU - Meckel, S. TI - Double Solitaire Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke: Effective Rescue Strategy for Refractory Artery Occlusions? AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A4133 DP - 2015 Mar 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 552--556 VI - 36 IP - 3 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/3/552.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/36/3/552.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2015 Mar 01; 36 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy by using a single stent retriever system has demonstrated high efficacy for recanalization of large-artery occlusions in acute stroke. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel double Solitaire stent retriever technique as an escalating treatment for occlusions that are refractory to first-line single stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated with the double stent retriever technique by using the Solitaire system were retrospectively selected from 2 large neurointerventional centers. Time to recanalization, angiographic (TICI) and clinical outcomes (mRS), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Ten patients (median NIHSS score, 16; mean age, 70 years) with MCA M1 segment (n = 5) and terminal ICA (n = 5 including 2 ICA tandem) occlusions were included. Prior single stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy had been performed in 9 patients (median number of passes, 3). Median time to recanalization was 60 minutes (interquartile range, 45–87 minutes). Procedure-related complications occurred in 1 patient; overall mortality was 20%. Recanalization of the target vessel (TICI 2b/3) was achieved in 80%. Good clinical outcome (mRS 0–2) was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary feasibility study, the double Solitaire stent retriever technique proved to be an effective method for recanalization of anterior circulation large-artery occlusions refractory to standard stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy. DACdistal-access catheterICATinternal carotid artery terminusMTmechanical thrombectomySRstent retriever