1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [ca0128c3-3570-46d2-b625-74fa14ab81d4] => Array ( [runtime-id] => ca0128c3-3570-46d2-b625-74fa14ab81d4 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [c276b84d-12c9-461c-838a-3b37d64a32f8] => Array ( [runtime-id] => c276b84d-12c9-461c-838a-3b37d64a32f8 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;f55d3da0210e9a9725eca8b58245e06143677ee4 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [adb37dce-db6d-476a-a476-0fd98b9944c4] => Array ( [runtime-id] => adb37dce-db6d-476a-a476-0fd98b9944c4 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [42483711-824a-43e0-bc60-0f2ef2a1fe32] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 42483711-824a-43e0-bc60-0f2ef2a1fe32 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;f55d3da0210e9a9725eca8b58245e06143677ee4 ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Park, S.I. AU - Kim, B.M. AU - Kim, D.I. AU - Shin, Y.S. AU - Suh, S.H. AU - Chung, E.C. AU - Kim, S.Y. AU - Kim, S.H. AU - Won, Y.S. TI - Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up of Stent-Only Therapy for Acute Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A1561 DP - 2009 Aug 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1351--1356 VI - 30 IP - 7 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/30/7/1351.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/30/7/1351.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2009 Aug 01; 30 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little has been known about the clinical and angiographic follow-up results of stent-only therapy for intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical, and angiographic follow-up of stent-only therapy for VBDA.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with 29 VBDAs (11 ruptured, 18 unruptured), not suitable for deconstructive treatment, underwent stent-only therapy. Feasibility, safety, clinical, and angiographic follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Angiographic outcomes were compared between single-stent and multiple-stent groups.RESULTS: All attempted stent placements were successfully accomplished without any treatment-related complication. Of the 11 ruptured VBDAs, 4 were treated by single stents, 6 by double overlapping stents, and 1 by triple overlapping stents. Of the 18 unruptured VBDAs, 6 were treated by stents, and 12 by double overlapping stents. One patient with a ruptured VBDA, treated by single stent, had rebleeding and died. None of the remaining patients had posttreatment bleeding during follow-up (mean, 28 months; range, 7–50 months). Eight patients with ruptured VBDA and all patients with unruptured VBDA had excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, 0–1). The remaining 2 patients with ruptured VBDA were moderately disabled because of the initial damage. Angiographic follow-up was available in 27 VBDAs, 4 to 42 months (mean, 12 months) after treatment. Follow-up angiograms revealed complete obliteration of the dissecting aneurysm in 12, partial obliteration in 12, stable in 1, enlargement in 1, and in-stent occlusion in 1. Angiographic improvement (complete or partial obliteration) was more frequent in the multiple-stent group (17/17) than in the single-stent group (7/9; P < .05).CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, stent-only therapy was safe and effective in the treatment of VBDAs that were not deemed suitable for treatment with parent-artery occlusion.