1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [1026ee38-4154-41f3-9706-8b4bc409c6aa] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 1026ee38-4154-41f3-9706-8b4bc409c6aa [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [4c0a2f8c-a7c1-46e7-9631-84165138a392] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 4c0a2f8c-a7c1-46e7-9631-84165138a392 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;0bc1032f5fdf726f7dfa10bc6dd514e26f2b52e9 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [7141a385-2c5e-4043-aadd-c887a9617624] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 7141a385-2c5e-4043-aadd-c887a9617624 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [19305109-3e76-48e6-8a11-135b0a5e8c61] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 19305109-3e76-48e6-8a11-135b0a5e8c61 [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;0bc1032f5fdf726f7dfa10bc6dd514e26f2b52e9 ) ) ) PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Habermann, C.R. AU - Gossrau, P. AU - Kooijman, H. AU - Graessner, J. AU - Cramer, M.C. AU - Kaul, M.G. AU - Reitmeier, F. AU - Jaehne, M. AU - Adam, G. TI - Monitoring of Gustatory Stimulation of Salivary Glands by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging: Comparison of 1.5T and 3T AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A0587 DP - 2007 Sep 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1547--1551 VI - 28 IP - 8 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/28/8/1547.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/28/8/1547.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2007 Sep 01; 28 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare different field strengths monitoring physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using diffusion-weighted (DW) echo-planar imaging (EPI).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were examined with a DW-EPI sequence at 1.5T and 3T before and after oral stimulation with commercially available lemon juice. The b factors used were 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were evaluated with a manually placed region of interest including the entire parotid gland. For comparison of results, a Student t test was used on the basis of the mean of the volunteer median values. To compare both field strengths, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).RESULTS: DW-EPI MR imaging visualized the parotid glands of all volunteers. With 1.5T, the mean ADC before stimulation was 1.12 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.08 × 10−3 mm2/s. After stimulation with lemon juice, the ADC increased to 1.18 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.09 × 10−3 mm2/s. For 3T, the ADC before stimulation was 1.14 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.04 × 10−3 mm2/s, with an increase to 1.17 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.05 × 10−3 mm2/s after stimulation. For both field strengths, the increase in ADC after stimulation was significant (P < .001). High correlations between both field strengths were found pre- and poststimulation (r = 0.955, and 0.936, respectively).CONCLUSION: DW-EPI MR imaging allows monitoring of physiologic changes due to oral stimulation of parotid glands by using DW imaging with high correlation between 1.5T and 3T.