1naresh2naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [89208472-0afb-4736-bfde-71ad5f163c39] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 89208472-0afb-4736-bfde-71ad5f163c39 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [e038aac9-91b8-49ce-b49b-23607d8a8ffa] => Array ( [runtime-id] => e038aac9-91b8-49ce-b49b-23607d8a8ffa [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;b1506f75a99b7cc1f6603bf6e14b9a73f7c94165 ) ) ) 1naresh2nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) [3e2609d2-306b-44ff-9e44-584c243ebe90] => Array ( [runtime-id] => 3e2609d2-306b-44ff-9e44-584c243ebe90 [type] => toll-free-key [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => FreeToRead [privilege] => Array ( [cc624f2e-cbbd-47df-8cc0-0b5d2536595d] => Array ( [runtime-id] => cc624f2e-cbbd-47df-8cc0-0b5d2536595d [type] => toll-free-key ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => toll-free-key [value] => tf_ipsecsha;b1506f75a99b7cc1f6603bf6e14b9a73f7c94165 ) ) ) RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis JF American Journal of Neuroradiology JO Am. J. Neuroradiol. FD American Society of Neuroradiology SP 46 OP 52 DO 10.3174/ajnr.A1302 VO 30 IS 1 A1 Habibi, R. A1 Lell, M.M. A1 Steiner, R. A1 Ruehm, S.G. A1 Sayre, J.W. A1 Nael, K. A1 Finn, J.P. YR 2009 UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/30/1/46.abstract AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) acquired at 3T exquisitely depict carotid artery (CA) stenosis. In this study, we examined the agreement of different vessel-analysis tools with manual quantitative measurement by 2 readers using CE-MRA data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three vessel tools determining the trajectory of the vessel of interest and, subsequently, the vessel dimensions were tested against manual measurements. Diameter and area stenoses were calculated. CE-MRA data of 32 patients with CA stenosis were evaluated. The agreement between different measurements was assessed with κ statistics after categorizing stenosis (<25%, 25%–49%, 50%–69%, 70%–99%, and 100%).RESULTS: The mean grades of stenosis based on diameter measurements were 59% (readers) and 60%/56%/59% based on the analysis with tools A/B/C (P = 0.2–0.7). κ values for agreement between readers and the vessel tools were 0.73/0.77/0.77 (tools A/B/C for all CAs) and 0.66/0.74/0.75 (for the symptomatic side). The mean grades of stenoses based on area measurements for tools A/B/C were 68%/63%/69% versus 58% for readers. Values from readers differed significantly from those for tools A and C (P < 0.01). κ values for agreement between readers and the vessel tools were 0.66/0.55/0.64 (for all CAs) and 0.53/0.44/0.57 (for the symptomatic side).CONCLUSIONS: The automated approach allows accurate assessment of vessel dimensions in MRA images at least for diameter measurements according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria.