1naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Tailored Vessel-Catheter Diameter Ratio in a Direct Aspiration First-Pass Technique: Is It a Matter of Caliber?
JF American Journal of Neuroradiology
JO Am. J. Neuroradiol.
FD American Society of Neuroradiology
SP 546
OP 550
DO 10.3174/ajnr.A6987
VO 42
IS 3
A1 Pampana, E.
A1 Fabiano, S.
A1 De Rubeis, G.
A1 Bertaccini, L.
A1 Stasolla, A.
A1 Vallone, A.
A1 Pingi, A.
A1 Mangiardi, M.
A1 Anticoli, S.
A1 Gasperini, C.
A1 Cotroneo, E.
YR 2021
UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/42/3/546.abstract
AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aspiration technique has gained a prominent role in mechanical thrombectomy. The thrombectomy goal is successful revascularization (modified TICI ≥ 2b) and first-pass effect. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the vessel-catheter ratio on the modified TICI ≥ 2b and first-pass effect.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. From January 2018 to April 2020, 111/206 (53.9%) were eligible after applying the exclusion criteria. Culprit vessel diameters were measured by 2 neuroradiologists, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for assessing the vessel-catheter ratio cutoff for modified TICI ≥ 2b and the first-pass effect. Time to groin puncture and fibrinolysis were weighted using logistic regression. All possible intervals (interval size, 0.1; sliding interval, 0.01) of the vessel-catheter ratio were plotted, and the best and worst intervals were compared using the χ2 test.RESULTS: Modified TICI ≥ 2b outcome was achieved in 75/111 (67.5%), and first-pass effect was achieved in 53/75 (70.6%). The MCA diameter was 2.1 mm with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The optimal vessel-catheter ratio cutoffs for modified TICI ≥ 2b were ≤1.51 (accuracy = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58–0.76; P = 0.001), and for first-pass effect, they were significant (≤1.33; P = .31). The modified TICI ≥ 2b odds ratio and relative risk were 9.2 (95% CI, 2.4–36.2; P = 0.002) and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.2–8.7; P = .024). The odds ratio remained significant after logistic regression (7.4; 95% CI, 1.7–32.5; P = .008). First-pass effect odds ratio and relative risk were not significant (2.1 and 1.5; P &gt; .05, respectively). The modified TICI ≥ 2b best and worst vessel-catheter ratio intervals were not significantly different (55.6% versus 85.7%, P = .12). The first-pass effect best vessel-catheter ratio interval was significantly higher compared with the worst one (78.6% versus 40.0%, P = .03).CONCLUSIONS: The aspiration catheter should be selected according to culprit vessel diameter. The optimal vessel-catheter ratio cutoffs were ≤1.51 for modified TICI ≥ 2b with an odds ratio of 9.2 and a relative risk of 3.2.ADAPTa direct aspiration first‐pass techniquemTICImodified TICI