1naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rauch, R A
AU  - Jinkins, J R
TI  - Variability of corpus callosal area measurements from midsagittal MR images: effect of subject placement within the scanner.
DP  - 1996 Jan 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 27--28
VI  - 17
IP  - 1
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/17/1/27.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/17/1/27.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.1996 Jan 01; 17
AB  - Variation in corpus callosum area measured from midsagittal MR images was evaluated in 12 healthy subjects who were each imaged four to seven times. Statistically significant differences between measurements of the same subject were found on 47% of the images, with an average difference of 5.9% between images.