1naresh2naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [84014eda-51c2-4fb8-885f-a22d7af4a0ca] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => 84014eda-51c2-4fb8-885f-a22d7af4a0ca
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [b4653e20-ef75-408d-ab02-042bbf912c1a] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => b4653e20-ef75-408d-ab02-042bbf912c1a
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;c686cba2cf6d43590c2eca3e05b8b203f42c4620
                )

        )

)
1naresh2naresh<pre>Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

    [560c4a8e-c65f-4299-9083-8af7cf53efb4] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => 560c4a8e-c65f-4299-9083-8af7cf53efb4
            [type] => toll-free-key
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => FreeToRead
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [4697556c-866d-4fea-8534-46ee7570b292] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => 4697556c-866d-4fea-8534-46ee7570b292
                            [type] => toll-free-key
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => toll-free-key
                    [value] => tf_ipsecsha;c686cba2cf6d43590c2eca3e05b8b203f42c4620
                )

        )

)
PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lee, J.Y.
AU  - Seo, J.H.
AU  - Cho, Y.D.
AU  - Kang, H.-S.
AU  - Han, M.H.
TI  - Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms Using a Microcatheter Protective Technique: Results and Outcomes in 75 Aneurysms
AID  - 10.3174/ajnr.A2411
DP  - 2011 May 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 917--922
VI  - 32
IP  - 5
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/32/5/917.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/32/5/917.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2011 May 01; 32
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The microcatheter protective technique positions an additional microcatheter in the parent or side-branching artery to protect it during coil embolization. The purpose of this study was to describe this method and to evaluate its efficacy and safety as an alternative to a multiple-microcatheter or balloon- or stent-assisted technique for wide-neck aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 74 patients (43 women; mean age, 59.6 years) with 75 wide-neck aneurysms treated with the microcatheter protective technique between January 2003 and April 2010 was performed. Immediate postembolization angiograms were evaluated by using a conventional angiographic scale, and clinical evaluation was performed by using the GOS. Clinical and imaging follow-up were available in 57 (76%) patients, with a mean of 14.7 months. RESULTS: Postembolization angiograms demonstrated total occlusion in 45 of 75 (60%) aneurysms, a neck remnant in 17 (22.7%), and body filling in 13 (17.3%). The technique-related complication rate was 17.4% (13/75), and the procedural-related morbidity rate was 1.3% (1/74). All patients, except 3 complicated cases with a GOS of &amp;lt;4, had a GOS of 5 at the end of the study period. Of the 57 aneurysms with follow-up, recanalization developed in 5 (8.8%) aneurysms, and 3 (5.3%) cases of major recanalization were re-treated endovascularly. CONCLUSIONS: The microcatheter protective technique is feasible and safe for coil embolization of wide-neck aneurysms, especially in cases that are not suitable for multiple catheter or balloon- or stent-assisted techniques. AcomAanterior communicating arteryDSAdigital subtraction angiographyEVDexternal ventricular drainGOSGlasgow Outcome ScaleHunt and HessHHSAHsubarachnoid hemorrhagevPDvolumetric packing density