1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Annular fissures identified and pain response at provocation discography
Peripheral Annular Morphology by MR Imaging Discography-Provoked Pain Response Severe Pain Negative for Pain Total Concordant Pain(% of Total) Nonconcordant Pain(% of Total) EAF 22/39 (56.4%) 10/39 (25.6%) 7/39 (18%) 39 (100%) Focal high signal on T2WI only 0 0 1 1 No MR imaging evidence of annular fissure/tear 14/60 (23.3%) 4/60 (6.7%) 42/60 (70.0%) 60 (100%) Total 36/100 (36%) 14/100 (14%) 50/100 (50%) 100 (100%)