1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:The relationship between the development of RICs and AVM obliteration after each GKRS
Obliteration Incomplete Obliteration P Value Initial GKRS (No.) 104 46 RICs (No.) (%) 34 (32.7) 16 (34.8) .85 Repeat GKRS (No.) 16 9 Radiologic RICs after initial GKRS (No.) (%) 9 (56.3) 0 (0) .007 Radiologic RICs after repeat GKRS(No.) (%) 3 (18.8) 2 (22.2) 1.0