1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Patient characteristics and WML scores
All Men Women Patient characteristics No. of patients (%) 48 25 (52%) 23 (48%) Classic phenotype (No.) (%) 48 (100%) 25 (100%) 23 (100%) No. of scan data sets (No.) 229 117 112 Age at first MR imaging (median) (range) (yr) 44 (15–69) 31 (15–55) 46 (22–69) Patients <18 yr (No.) (%) 2 (4.2%) 2 (8.0%) 0 (0.0%) Ever ERT (No.) (%) 48 (100%) 25 (100%) 23 (100%) Months treated (mean) 89 (SD, 34) 92 (SD, 39) 86 (SD, 30) Events before first MR imaging Cerebrovascular event (No.) (%) 2 (4.2%) 1 (4.0%) 1 (4.3%) TIA (No.) (%) 1 (2.1%) 1 (4.0%) 0 (0.0%) Kidney function at first MR imaging eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m2 (median) (range) 101 (40–154) 105 (49–154) 100 (40–127) eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (No.) (%) 5 (10.4%) 3 (12%) 2 (8.7%) WML scores Fazekas first MR imaging (median) (range) 1 (0–6) 0 (0–6) 1 (0–6) Fazekas first MR imaging (mean) 1.5 (SD, 1.7) 1.4 (SD, 2.0) 1.5 (SD, 1.3) Fazekas > 0 first MR imaging (No.) (%) 29 (60%) 11 (44%) 18 (78%) Fazekas last MR imaging (median) (range)a 1 (0–6) 1 (0–6) 1 (0–6) Fazekas last MR imaging (mean) 1.5 (SD, 1.6) 1.6 (SD, 1.9) 1.4 (SD, 1.3) Fazekas > 0 last MR imaging (No.) (%) 33 (69%) 15 (60%) 18 (78%)
Note:—eGFR indicates estimated glomerular filtration rate.
↵a For 32 patients, additional MR imaging after Fazekas scoring was performed. For these patients, the last known Fazekas score was used.