1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparative distribution of spinal segment variants
Spinal Segment Variant Overall (n = 450) Women (n = 279) Men (n = 171) P Valuea Spinal segment distribution variantb 107 (23.8%) 71 (25.4%) 36 (21.1%) .343 Cervical rib 19 (4.2%) 13 (4.7%) 6 (3.5%) .728 TLTV 69 (15.3%) 36 (12.9%) 33 (19.3%) .091 LSTV 119 (26.4%) 60 (21.5%) 59 (34.5%) .003