1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Properties of radiopaque materials used in market-approved FDs
Radiopaque Materials Alloy Radiopacity (Density)a Market-Approved FD Examples Radiopaque Element Type Platinum-tungsten ∼19.75 g/cm3 PED, PED Flex, PED Shield, Surpass Streamline, Surpass Evolve 12 Platinum-tungsten wires incorporated into the overall braid2 Tantalum 16.65 g/cm3 FRED, FRED Jr, FRED X Interwoven tantalum strands between braided layers and 4 markers on flared ends of device2 Platinum 21.45 g/cm3 Silk, Silk+, p64, Tubridge Silk features 4 platinum wire strands with flared ends. Silk+ features 8 platinum wires and 4 platinum coils at device ends.2 The p64 features 2 platinum wires wrapped along the length of the device and 8 markers at the device end.36 Tubridge features 2 platinum strands2 Nitinol outer, platinum inner DFT ∼6 g/cm3 for nitinol; 21.45 g/cm3 for platinum Silk Vista, Silk Vista Baby, p48MW (phenox), p48_HPC, DERIVO 48 Braided DFT wires. DERIVO features 3 additional markers on the device end2 Cobalt-nickel-chromium outer, platinum inner DFT ∼8.5 g/cm3 for cobalt-nickel-chromium; 21.45 g/cm3 for platinum Pipeline Vantage 48 or 64 Braided DFT wires14
a Density is given as a rough proxy for radiopacity in lieu of the lack of corroborative data for these materials and geometries by a consistent approach. Future studies, outside the present scope, may focus on quantitative radiopacity comparison as a function of material, geometry, filtering materials, and imaging parameters. Such a study could be used to aid in the design of future devices.