1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 2: 
Pooled subgroup analysis and metaregression for CTP for detection of delayed cerebral ischemia
StudiesPooled Sensitivity (%)Pooled Specificity (%)Positive LRNegative LRDiagnostic OR
(95% CI)(95% CI)
CTP <72 hr555.8 (27.3–80.8)93.7 (66.8–99.1)8.81 (1.12–68.38)0.47 (0.23–0.96)18.0.66 (1.45–239.63)
CTP >72 hr584.5 (57.3–95.7)84.9 (48.0–97.2)5.60 (1.14–27.60)0.18 (0.05–0.65)30.73 (2.50–378.08)
Relative sensitivity >72 hr vs <72 hr = 1.52 (95% CI, 0.85–2.68); P  = .11; relative specificity >72 hr vs <72 hr = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67–1.22); P = .47
 MTT threshold575.4 (61.6–85.4)66.6 (51.3–79.0)2.25 (1.33–3.81)0.37 (0.20–0.69)6.10 (1.98–18.78)
 MTT qualitative567.9 (56.9–85.9)78.8 (69.2–85.9)3.19 (2.09–4.89)0.41 (0.29–0.57)7.86 (3.92–15.76)
Relative sensitivity threshold vs qualitative = 1.14 (95% CI, 0.92–1.40); P = .24; relative specificity threshold vs qualitative = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02); P = .10
 CBF774.1 (60.8–84.1)87.4 (75.1–94.2)5.91 (2.99–11.67)0.30 (0.20–0.45)19.96 (8.99–44.32)
 CBV764.3 (50.6–75.9)73.9 (60.1–84.1)2.45 (1.72–3.52)0.48 (0.37–0.64)5.08 (3.16–8.17)
Relative sensitivity CBV vs CBF = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69–1.12); P = .30; relative specificity CBV vs CBF = 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70–1.05); P = .13
 CBF878.9 (72.7–84.0)79.6 (64.7–89.3)3.87 (2.11–7.10)0.27 (0.19–0.36)14.62 (6.38–33.49)
 MTT881.5 (73.5–87.5)79.2 (69.9–86.2)3.91 (2.68–5.71)0.23 (0.16–0.34)16.77 (9.31–30.22)
Relative sensitivity MTT vs CBF =1.03 (95% CI, 0.93–1.14); P = .64; relative specificity MTT vs CBF = 1.02 (0.85–1.23); P = .85
 CBV670.6 (63.0–77.2)68.5 (59.9–75.9)2.24 (1.72–2.91)0.43 (0.33–0.56)5.21 (3.24–8.40)
 MTT684.3 (76.9–89.7)74.4 (66.7–80.9)3.30 (2.43–4.47)0.21 (0.14–0.33)15.64 (8.03–30.46)
Relative sensitivity MTT vs CBV = 1.182 (95% CI, 1.05–1.33); P = .009; relative specificity MTT vs CBV = 1.09 (95% CI, 0.94–1.25); P = .27