1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence of arterial findings, PCD-CT versus EID-CT
Session 1: PCD-SR vs EID-SR PCD-SR (1–5) EID-SR (1–5) P Value B vs. A (−2 to 2) Reader 1 Overall image quality 4.0 ± 0.0 3.0 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 90.4 ± 9.1 74.2 ± 15.9 <.001 0.8 ± 0.8 Reader 2 Overall image quality 4.9 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 0.5 <.001 1.0 ± 0.0 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 86.4 ± 8.8 70.4 ± 7.9 <.001 0.5 ± 0.8 Reader 1 & 2 combined Overall image quality 4.5 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 0.4 <.001 1.0 ± 0.0 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 88.4 ± 9.1 72.3 ± 12.6 <.001 0.7 ± 0.8 Session 2: PCD-UHR-CNN vs EID-SR PCD-UHR-CNN (1–5) EID-SR (1–5) P value B vs. A (−2 to 2) Reader 1 Overall image quality 4.0 ± 0.0 3.0 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 93 ± 5.8 78.2 ± 9.3 <.001 0.6 ± 1.4 Reader 2 Overall image quality 4.9 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.0 <.001 1.9 ± 0.3 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 88.6 ± 5.9 70.4 ± 5 <.001 1.0 ± 1.5 Reader 1 & 2 combined Overall image quality 4.5 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.0 <.001 1.5 ± 0.5 Diagnostic confidence (0–100) 90.8 ± 6.2 74.3 ± 8.4 <.001 0.8 ± 1.4