1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


TABLE 1: 
Angiographic scores and neointima thickness in lateral wall and bifurcation aneurysms treated with coils
ParameterLateral Wall Aneurysms (n = 6)Bifurcation Aneurysms (n = 6)
Initial angiographic score0.67 ± 1.030.40 ± 0.89
Score at 3 wks1.50 ± 0.550.75 ± 0.96
Evolution of score at 3 wks0.83 ± 0.750.75 ± 0.96
Score at 3 mo1.17 ± 0.753.00 ± 0.71*
Evolution of score at 3 mo0.50 ± 1.052.60 ± 0.55†
Neointima at 3 mo (μm)170.00 ± 42.4329.80 ± 24.35‡
  • Note.—Data are the mean ± SD.
  • * This score was significantly worse in bifurcation than in lateral wall aneurysms (P = .004).
  • † This score was significantly worse in bifurcation than in lateral wall aneurysms (P = .003).
  • ‡ This measurement was significantly thinner in bifurcation than in lateral wall aneurysms (P = .0004).