1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

TABLE 3:

Angiographic scores and neointima thickness in bifurcation aneurysms treated with coils alone or with cyanoacrylate

ParameterCoils Alone (n = 6)Cyanoacrylate and Coils (n = 6)
Initial angiographic score0.40 ± 0.891.00 ± 1.16
Score at 3 wks0.75 ± 0.960.00 ± 0.00
Evolution of score at 3 wks0.75 ± 0.96−1.00 ± 1.16
Score at 3 mo3.00 ± 0.710.50 ± 1.00*
Evolution of score at 3 mo2.60 ± 0.55−0.50 ± 1.92
Neointima at 3 mo (μm)29.80 ± 24.36300.00 ± 50.09
  • Note.—Data are the mean ± SD.

  • * This score was significantly better in aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate over a coil than in those treated with coils alone (P = .001).

  • This score is significantly better in aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate over a coil than in those treated with coils alone (P = .01).

  • This measurement at the neck of aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate behind a coil is significantly thicker than that in aneurysms treated with coils alone (P < .05).