1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 3:Angiographic scores and neointima thickness in bifurcation aneurysms treated with coils alone or with cyanoacrylate
Parameter Coils Alone (n = 6) Cyanoacrylate and Coils (n = 6) Initial angiographic score 0.40 ± 0.89 1.00 ± 1.16 Score at 3 wks 0.75 ± 0.96 0.00 ± 0.00 Evolution of score at 3 wks 0.75 ± 0.96 −1.00 ± 1.16 Score at 3 mo 3.00 ± 0.71 0.50 ± 1.00* Evolution of score at 3 mo 2.60 ± 0.55 −0.50 ± 1.92† Neointima at 3 mo (μm) 29.80 ± 24.36 300.00 ± 50.09‡
Note.—Data are the mean ± SD.
* This score was significantly better in aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate over a coil than in those treated with coils alone (P = .001).
† This score is significantly better in aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate over a coil than in those treated with coils alone (P = .01).
‡ This measurement at the neck of aneurysms treated with cyanoacrylate behind a coil is significantly thicker than that in aneurysms treated with coils alone (P < .05).