1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 2:Endovascular techniques and occlusion in 37 patients with 39 intracranial aneurysms
Endovascular Technique Immediate Occlusion Angiographic Follow-up Complete Neck Remnant Further Thrombosis Unchanged Recanalization Group 1 Liquid embolic 9 0 0 7 2 Stent + liquid embolic 2 0 0 2 0 Group 2 Liquid embolic and coils 9 6 1 5 9 Stent + liquid embolic and coils 9 4 2 11 0 Total 29 10 3 25 11
Note.—Two patients each with one intracranial aneurysm died.