1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 2:Results of qualitative analysis in 83 patients who had lesions on initial DW images
Item of Analysis Type of Consensus Time Window Total 0 ∼ 3 hours 3 ∼ 6 hours Lesion conspicuity 2000 > 1000 15 8 23 2000 ∼ 1000 27 33 60 1000 > 2000 0 0 0 Total 42 41 83 Lesion extent 2000 > 1000 9 2 11 2000 ∼ 1000 33 39 72 1000 > 2000 0 0 0 Total 42 41 83 Artifacts 2000 > 1000 2 0 2 2000 ∼ 1000 38 40 78 1000 > 2000 2 1 3 Total 42 41 83
Note.—2000 > 1000, b = 2000 images are superior to b = 1000 images; 2000 ∼ 1000, b = 2000 images are the same as b = 1000 images; 1000 > 2000, b = 2000 images are inferior to b = 1000 images in each item of qualitative analysis.