1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 5:Stenosis quantification
CA Stenosis Number of Lesions on CA MRA Agreement Lesions MRA Falsely Upgraded Lesions MRA Falsely Downgraded Lesions MRA False-Negatives <50% 20 4 (20%) 7 (35%) 9 (45%) 50–<75% 25 12 (48%) 6 (24%) 1 (4%) 6 (24%) 75–99% 9 7 (78%) 1 (11%) 1 (11%) 100% 8 1 (13%) 4 (50%) 3 (38%)
Note:— MRA indicates MR angiography; CA, conventional angiography. Total MRA agreement is 43 lesions, excluding 2 aneurysms. Number of lesions correctly graded or up- and downgraded by MRA when compared with CA (n = 62 CA lesions; excludes 2 aneurysms)