1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 6:Summary of median levels (ML) and total number of levels (NL) of recommended spinal radiation by MRI protocol type
MRI Protocol Type ML NL 1 17.10 (0.97) 7.63 (1.05) 2 17.18 (0.96) 8.71 (1.02) 3 17.58 (0.97) 8.75 (1.04) 4 17.04 (0.96) 8.74 (1.00)
Note:—Values are presented as mean (SE). Differences in means of ML and NL were not statistically significant at pairwise comparisons of any 2 protocol types.