1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 1: Influence of kVp, CBR, slip composition, and orientation on artifact volume
Ratio KVp* 90 vs 120, High mode 1.3 120 vs 140, High mode 1.2 90 vs 120, Standard mode 1.4 120 vs 140, Standard mode 1.2 Conebeam reconstruction vs linear interpolation* 1.1 Cobalt-containing alloy vs Titanium clip# High mode 1.3 Standard mode 1.5 In plane vs perpendicular‡ 1.4
Note:—CBR indicates conebeam reconstruction.
* for titanium- and cobalt-containing alloy clip.
# for all kVp/mAs combinations.
‡ for both clips in high and standard mode.