1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Topographical distribution of MR lesions in 45 patients
Location No. Patients Sublocation No. Patients Supratentorial Cortex 13 (29%) Any deep gray matter 41 (91%) Caudate 25 (56%) Putamen 30 (67%) Globus pallidus 19 (42%) Lentiform 15 (33%) Corpus striatum 7 (16%) Thalamus 10 (22%) Any white matter 39 (87%) Deep 25 (56%) Periventicular 11 (24%) Internal capsule 28 (62%) Subcortical 12 (27%) Infratentorial Gray matter Dentate 0 White matter Brain stem 2 (4%) Cerebellar peduncle 1 (2%)