1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 1:

Topographical distribution of MR lesions in 45 patients

LocationNo. PatientsSublocationNo. Patients
SupratentorialCortex13 (29%)
Any deep gray matter41 (91%)Caudate25 (56%)
Putamen30 (67%)
Globus pallidus19 (42%)
Lentiform15 (33%)
Corpus striatum7 (16%)
Thalamus10 (22%)
Any white matter39 (87%)Deep25 (56%)
Periventicular11 (24%)
Internal capsule28 (62%)
Subcortical12 (27%)
InfratentorialGray matterDentate0
White matterBrain stem2 (4%)
Cerebellar peduncle1 (2%)