1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Prospective population-based cohort studies of white matter-lesion severity and incident stroke
Study Group Clinical Entry Criteria Total Number of Patients Follow-up (y) Definition of WM Outcome Variable % of Incident Strokes During Follow-up by WM Outcome Variable Cumulative Stroke Incidence Multivariable Adjusted Relative Risk (95% CI) Subtype of Stroke Subtype of Ischemic Stroke Dutch TIA Trial Group7 TIA or non-disabling ischemic stroke (Rankin ≤3) 3017 Not clearly defined WMH vs No WMH 15% vs 8% 19% vs 10% (3 y) 1.6 (1.2–2.2) Ischemic 90% vs 89%; hemorrhage 6% vs 9%; unknown 4% vs 2% Large artery 47% vs 45%; lacunar 33% vs 29%; vertebrobasilar 10% vs 15% NASCET Group5 Symptomatic carotid artery disease without WMH on entry CT 596 6.0 (median) Development of WMH vs no WMH 36% vs 23.5% Not defined 1.5 (1.0–2.4) Not defined Large artery 66% vs 73%; lacunar 29% vs 21%; cardioembolic 5% vs 6% ARIC Group10 No history of stroke of TIA 1684 4.7 (median) Grade ≥3 vs grade <3* 6.5% vs 1.3% 6.8% vs 1.4% (5 y) 3.4 (1.5–7.7) Not subdivided by WM status: ischemic 78%; hemorrhage 16%; combined 6% Not defined Rotterdam Scan Study Group9 No history of stroke or TIA 1077 4.2 (mean) Third tertile grade vs first tertile grade Not defined Not defined 4.7 (2.0–11.2) (periventricular lesions); 3.6 (1.4–9.2) (subcortical lesions) Not subdivided by WM status: ischemic 74%; hemorrhage 10%; unspecified 16% Not defined CHS Group8 No history of stroke or TIA 3293 7 (median) Grade ≥5 vs grade ≤1† 27.6% vs 6.0% 2.8% vs 0.6% (annual risk) 3.0 (1.9–4.7) Ischemic (81%) Lacunar (15%); cardioembolic (27%); atherosclerotic (5%); unknown (47%); mixed (6%)
Note.— TIA indicates transient ischemic attack; WMH, white matter hypodensity; NASCET, North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Group; ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study; CHS, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group; CI, confidence interval.
* WM grade 3 defined as thicker continuous periventricular rim with scattered patches of subcortical WM lesions.
† Grade 1 defined as discontinuous periventricular rim or minimal “dot”of subcortical disease; grade 5 defined as mild periventricular confluence surrounding the frontal and occipital horn.