1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Radiographic factor combinations that predict a diagnosis of tortuosity
Radiographic Factor Combination Concordance Statistic Sensitivity Specificity Factors 5 & 6 .903 89 (CI .79–1) 93 (CI .86–1) Factors 3, 5, & 6 .911 85 (CI .66–1) 93 (CI .86–1) Factors 3 & 6 .898 85 (CI .66–1) 91 (CI .83–.98) Factor 5 .826 93 (CI .83–1) 80 (CI .64–.94) Factor 6 .832 93 (CI .83–1) 76 (CI .58–.91) Factor 3 .780 89 (CI .71–1) 69 (CI .46–.86)
Note:—CI indicates 95% confidence interval.