1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Correlations between fractional anisotropy and cognitive domains
Splenium Genu FWM Working memory .16 .43 .22 Verbal memory .00 −.28 −.49* Visual memory .14 .44* .29 Visuoconstruction .22 .15 .46* Psychomotor .16 .18 .20 Motor speed .47* .21 −.01 Frontal/executive −.25 −.26 −.18
Note:—Values are Pearson correlation coefficients.
* P < .05. FWM indicates frontal white matter.