1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparison of spatial resolutions in previous rat spinal cord injury in vivo MR imaging studies*
Voxel Volume (nl) In-Plane Resolution (μm) Section Thickness (μm) Field Strength Coil Type Study 2.25 78 × 78 370 17.6T Surface coil Present study 12.2 78 × 156 1000 1.9T Implanted Ford et al11 304 780 × 780 500 1.5T Surface coil Guizar-Sahagun et al12 17.3 76 × 76 3000 4.7T Surface coil Fraidakis et al13 76 195 × 195 2000 2.1T Surface coil Fukouka et al14 Information not provided 2800 2T Surface coil Ohta et al15 80 200 × 200 2000 4.7T Birdcage coil Metz et al16 12.7 130 × 98 1000 2T Implanted Bilgen et al17 8.1 78 × 104 1000 7T Implanted Narayana et al18
* If one study used different resolutions, the highest resolution is quoted.