1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Post-thrombolysis mTIMI grades in patients with angiographic demonstration of a clot outline sign versus those who did not demonstrate a clot outline sign
mTIMI Grade (%) 0 1 2 3 Outline sign (n = 19) 1 (5.3) 0 (0) 5 (26.3) 13 (68.4) No outline sign (n = 68) 21 (30.1) 10 (14.7) 17 (25) 20 (29.4) Total (n = 87) 22 (25.3) 10 (11.5) 22 (25.3) 33 (37.9)
Note:—mTIMI indicates modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade.
* Pearson correlation (P = .0055).