1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Comparison of eye lens dose savings on CT brain protocols using ATCM between titled axial-versus-helical modes and 16-section-versus-64-section MDCT
CT Brain Protocol* MDCT CARE Dose Mean Eye Lens Dose (mGy) Dose Savings (%) (P value) Protocol No. Tilted axial 16 + 15.56 81.1 (.000) 1 Helical 82.16 3 Tilted axial 16 + 15.56 67.0 (.000) 1 Helical 64 47.18 5 Helical 16 + 82.16 42.6 (.000) 3 64 47.18 5
Note:—ATCM indicates automatic tube current modulation.
* Comparison was made between protocols using the paired Student t test, and statistical significance was defined at P < .05.