1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of using MDI alone versus MDI in combination with medial and lateral orbital angles in predicting ON in Graves ophthalmopathy
Percentage MDI Alone MDI and Medial and Lateral Wall Angles Sensitivity 60.0 (18/30) 73.3 (22/30) Specificity 86.0 (43/50) 90.0 (45/50) Positive predictive value 72.0 (18/25) 81.5 (22/27) Negative predictive value 78.2 (43/55) 84.9 (45/53)