1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Comparison of procedural ruptures in 196 very small aneurysms and 1099 larger aneurysms
196 Aneurysms ≤ 3 mm in 187 Patients 1099 Aneurysms ≥ 4 mm in 1006 Patients Total 1295 Aneurysms in 1193 Patients Procedural ruptures 15 (7.7%) 36 (3.6%) 51 (3.9%) Ruptured aneurysms 15 (100%) 32 (88.9%) 47 (92.2%) Poor condition at treatment (HH III–V) 3 (20%) 15 (41.7%) 18 (35.3) Poor outcome (GOS 1–3) 5 (33.3%) 11 (30.6%) 16 (31.4%)
Note:—HH indicates Hunt and Hess grade; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale.