1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 4: 
Correlation between measured MR imaging distance and cervical lymph node metastasis
MR Imaging Distance (mm)No. of Patients (%) by Presence of Metastases
Absent (n = 28)Present (n = 15)
Tumor thickness
    <8.315 (100)0 (0)
    8.3–22.513 (52)12 (48)
    >22.50 (0)3 (100)
Sublingual distance
    08 (42)11 (58)
    0–8.510 (71)4 (29)
    >8.510 (100)0 (0)
Paralingual distance
    <00 (0)6 (100)
    0–5.38 (47)9 (53)
    >5.320 (100)0 (0)