1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Patient characteristics and associations between lymph node metastases and variables
Patient Characteristics Lymph Node Metastases Absent (n = 28) Present (n = 15) P value Sex, N (%) Male 29 (67) 20 (69) 9 (31) .67 Female 14 (33) 8 (57) 6 (43) Age (mean ± SD) 58 ± 15 57 ± 14 59 ± 16 .48 Performance status <2 35 (81) 23 (68) 12 (32) >.99 ≥2 8 (19) 5 (63) 3 (38) T classification, N (%) T1–2 34 (79) 26 (76) 8 (24) <.01 T3–4 9 (21) 2 (22) 7 (78) N classification, N (%) N0 32 (74) 25 (78) 7 (22) <.01 N1–3 11 (26) 3 (27) 8 (72) Differentiation, N(%) Well-moderate 38 (88) 25 (66) 13 (34) >.99 Poor 5 (12) 3 (60) 2 (40) Tumor thickness (mm) (mean ± SD) 11.7 ± 7.3 8.5 ± 4.5 17.8 ± 7.8 <.0001 Sublingual distance (mm) (mean ± SD) 4.0 ± 4.4 5.5 ± 4.4 1.1 ± 2.4 <.005 Paralingual distance (mm) (mean ± SD) 4.7 ± 5.1 7.2 ± 3.3 0 ± 4.5 <.0001