1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Multivariate logistic regression analysis for lymph node metastasis
Parameter β Coefficient SE Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Model 1 T classification, T3–4 1.89 1.40 6.60 (0.43–101.90) .18 N classification, N1–3 −2.23 1.75 0.11 (0.01–3.30) .20 Tumor thickness 0.36 0.16 1.43 (1.05–1.96) <.05 Sublingual distance −0.13 0.13 0.88 (0.68–1.14) .32 Model 2 T classification, T3–4 0.25 1.69 1.28 (0.05–35.15) .88 N classification, N1–3 −1.37 1.39 0.25 (0.02–3.89) .32 Sublingual distance 0.06 0.18 1.07 (0.75–1.50) .72 Paralingual distance −0.84 0.37 0.43 (0.21–0.89) <.05