1naresh

Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 4: AD comparison of MANCOVA results
Corr. Model Group No. Depend df F Sig. Partial Eta-Squared Observed Power Covariates
AD Comparison 
    Vs C AD = 19, C = 27 R 3 2.824 .050 .168 0.637 Age: 61.38 yr, ICV: 1401.93
L 3 3.893 .015 .218 0.789 
    Vs FTD AD = 19, FTD = 12 R 3 2.104 .123 .189 0.478 Age: 60.86 yr, ICV: 1416.58
L 3 5.516 .004 .380 0.903 
    Vs SD AD = 19, SD = 13 R 3 1.588 .214 .145 0.371 Age: 62.57 yr, ICV: 1424.31
L 3 1.173 .338 .112 0.280 
    Vs PNFA AD = 19, PNFA = 9 R 3 1.109 .365 .122 0.261 Age: 62.77 yr, ICV: 1400.43
L 3 7.246 .001 .475 0.980 
FTLD Comparisons 
    FTD vs C FTD = 12, C = 27 R 3 9.787 .000 .455 0.478 Age: 60.61 yr, ICV: 1402.59
L 3 14.492 .000 .554 0.903 
    FTD vs SD FTD = 12, SD = 13 R 3 2.301 .107 .247 0.499 Age: 61.70 yr, ICV: 1431.60
L 3 3.146 .047 .310 0.644 
    FTD vs PNFA FTD = 12, PNFA = 9 R 3 0.664 .586 .105 0.160 Age: 61.79 yr, ICV: 1401.14
L 3 0.741 .542 .116 0.175 
    SD vs Control FTD = 13, C = 27 R 3 3.436 .027 .223 0.724 Age: 61.98 yr, ICV: 1409.12
L 3 2.834 .052 .191 0.631 
    SD vs PNFA SD = 13, PNFA = 9 R 3 1.970 .155 .247 0.422 Age: 64.24 yr, ICV: 1413.09
L 3 4.040 .023 .402 0.279 
    PNFA vs C C = 27, PNFA = 9 R 3 9.479 .000 .471 0.993 Age: 62.07 yr, ICV: 1388.86
L 3 18.153 .000 .630 1.000 
Note:—Corr. Model indicates corrected model; Depend, dependent variable; df, degrees of freedom; F, F-statistic; Sig, significance; C, controls; R, right; L, left; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; SD, semantic dementia; PNFA, progressive nonfluent aphasia; ICV, total intracranial volume; Eta-Squared, the sum of squares between groups divided by total sum of squares.