1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 2: 
Agreement between reviewers*
CT/CTAMRI/MRA
AgreementκAgreementκ
Irregularity23/25−0.0421/250.57
Pseudoaneurysm20/250.4223/250.46
Intimal flap22/250.6925/25N/A†
Wall thickening (CT)/crescent sign (MRI)21/250.2522/250.65
Vessel patency24/250.8324/250.90
Overall110/1250.76115/1250.83
  • Note:—MRI indicates MR imaging.
  • * Overall agreement was 225/250 (κ = 0.80).
  • † κ could not be calculated because no intimal flaps were depicted with MRI/MRA.