1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 5:Large-aneurysm Roy score distribution for initial result and subsequent follow-up angiograms
Initial Roy Grade No. Aneurysms with Initial Result (%) Class 1 on Follow-Up (%) Class 2 on Follow-Up (%) Class 3 on Follow-Up (%) Recurrence (%) Class 1: complete occlusion 18 (42.9) 11 (61.1) 1 (5.6) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9) Class 2: residual neck 16 (38.1) 8 (50.0) 6 (37.5) 2 (12.5) 2 (12.5) Class 3: residual aneurysm 8 (19.0) 3 (37.5)* 0 (0) 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) Total 42 (100) 22 (52.4) 7 (16.7) 13 (31.0) 12 (28.6)
* One of these 3 patients had parent-vessel occlusion on follow-up angiography, which was graded as Roy class 1.