1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Small-aneurysm Roy score distribution for initial result and subsequent follow-up angiograms
Initial Roy Grade No. Aneurysms with Initial Result (%) Class 1 on Follow-Up (%) Class 2 on Follow-Up (%) Class 3 on Follow-Up (%) Recurrence (%) Class 1: complete occlusion 45 (57.0) 35 (77.8) 7 (15.6) 3 (6.7) 10 (22.2) Class 2: residual neck 25 (31.6) 14 (56.0) 9 (36.0) 2 (8.0) 2 (8.0) Class 3: residual aneurysm 9 (11.4) 4 (44.4)* 3 (33.3) 2 (22.2) 2 (22.2) Total 79 (100) 53 (67.1) 19 (24.1) 7 (75.9) 14 (17.7)
* One of these 4 patients had parent-vessel occlusion on the follow-up angiogram, which was graded as Roy class 1.