1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Classification results for the longitudinal dataset*
Patient Category MRI Classification Clinical Subtype MRI-RRMS MRI-SPMS Converters: patients with MS who converted from RRMS to SPMS RRMS 24 10 SPMS 9 15 Nonconverters: patients with MS who did not convert from RRMS to SPMS RRMS 49 7
Note:—MRI indicates MR imaging.
* This dataset included 2 categories of patients: converters versus nonconverters. There were 58 MR imaging examinations from 12 converters; 67.2% (39/58) of these time points were correctly classified. There were 56 MR imaging examinations from 13 nonconverters; 87.5% (49/56) of these time points were correctly classified