1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 6:Follow-up after endovascular treatment by postprocedural imaging
No Changes (No.) (%) Improvement (No.) (%) Increased Recanalization (No). (%) Results of postprocedural imaging Complete occlusion (n = 114) 72 (63.2) – 42 (36.8) Residual neck (n = 50) 24 (48.0) 9 (18.0) 17 (34.0) Residual aneurysm (n = 25) 12 (48.0) – 13 (52.0) Total 189 108 (57.1) 9 (4.8) 72 (38.1)