1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Anatomic result evaluations in relationship to aneurysm locationA
ACA/AcomA ICA MCA VB N % N % N % N % Total occlusion 110 55.0 202 64.1 86 69.4 39 70.9 Neck remnant 53 26.5 68 21.6 24 19.4 11 20.0 Aneurysm remnant 37 18.5 45 14.3 14 11.3 5 9.1 Total 200 100.0 315 100.0 124 100.0 55 100.0
Note:—ACA indicates anterior cerebral artery; AcomA, anterior communicating artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; VB, vertebrobasilar system.
A No significant differences were observed.